[2023:RJ-JP:20583]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 1911/2023
1. Smt. Versha Vaishnav D/o Shri Harimohan
Vaishnav, Aged About 22 Years, Resident Of
94, Mahawar Clony , Agra Road, Near Ganesh
Ji A Mandir, Police Station Kanota, Jaipur
(Raj). At Present Resident Of Sinsini, Police
Station Deeg, District Bharatpur (Raj).
2. Mukesh Kumar Son Of Shri Rajkumar, Aged
About 32 Years, Resident Of Sinsini, Police
Station Deeg, District Bharatpur (Raj).
----Petitioners
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.
2. Superintendent Of Police, Bharatpur, District
Bharatpur (Raj).
3. S.h.o. Police Station Deeg, District Bharatpur
(Raj).
4. S.h.o. Police Station Kanota, District Jaipur
(Raj).
5. Hari Mohan Vaishnav Son Of Shri Lakhan Lal,
Resident Of Mahawar Colony, Jamdoli, Agra
Road, Near Ganesh Ji Ka Mandir, Police
Station Kanota, Jaipur (Raj).
6. Laxmi Narayan Son Of Shri Hari Mohan
Vaishnav, Resident Of Mahawar Colony,
Jamdoli, Agra Road, Near Ganesh Ji Ka
Mandir, Police Station Kanota, Jaipur (Raj).
7. Deepak Vaishnav Son Of Shri Hari Mohan
Vaishnav, Resident Of Mahawar Colony,
Jamdoli, Agra Road, Near Ganesh Ji Ka
Mandir, Police Station Kanota, Jaipur (Raj).
8. Smt Pushpa Devi Wife Of Shri Hari Mohan
Vaishnav, Resident Of Mahawar Colony,
(Downloaded on 11/11/2023 at 07:44:49 PM)
[2023:RJ-JP:20583] (2 of 4) [CRLW-1911/2023]
Jamdoli, Agra Road, Near Ganesh Ji Ka
Mandir, Police Station Kanota, Jaipur (Raj).
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Anil Agarwal, Adv., for Mr. Vikram Singh Chauhan, Adv.
For : Mr. Ganesh Saini, P.P. Respondent(s)
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS Judgment / Order 02/09/2023 The petitioners have preferred the present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of necessary directions to the respondent authorities to provide adequate security and protection to them, as they are facing grave threat of life and liberty at the hands of private respondent(s).
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are of major age and they solemnized their marriage of their own free will. However, their family members are not agreeable to their marriage and have threatened them of dire consequences.
He prays that adequate police protection be provided to them.
(Downloaded on 11/11/2023 at 07:44:49 PM) [2023:RJ-JP:20583] (3 of 4) [CRLW-1911/2023] Though no specific instance or imminent threat has been pleaded but considering the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioners and having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is of the opinion that if the petitioners are having any apprehension or threat perception about their life and liberty from their relatives, they may move appropriate representation before the S.H.O. Police Station Deeg, District Bharatpur (Rajasthan) indicating their concern with the name(s) of probable assailants.
If any such representation is moved by the petitioners, the S.H.O. Police Station Deeg, District Bharatpur (Rajasthan) shall consider the same and after analysing the factual situation pass necessary orders or take action to ward off any untoward incident.
It is hereby clarified that this order may not be construed to be a validation of petitioners' marriage and proof of their age. Any observation made herein shall not affect any criminal or civil proceedings initiated against the petitioners, at the instance of their relatives.
With these observations, this criminal writ petition is disposed of.
(Downloaded on 11/11/2023 at 07:44:49 PM)
[2023:RJ-JP:20583] (4 of 4) [CRLW-1911/2023] The stay application also stands disposed of accordingly.
(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J DANISH USMANI /552 (Downloaded on 11/11/2023 at 07:44:49 PM) Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)