[2023:RJ-JP:20593]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 1913/2023
1. Maina Devi W/o Chenaram D/o Maghuram
Nayak, Aged About 31 Years, Resident Of
Vpo- Bhasina, Tehsil Sujangarh, District Churu
(Raj). Presently Residing At C/o Chhoturam
Son Of Jeenaram, Address 350, Vijay Nagar,
Daulatpura, Bainad Road, Jhotwara, Jaipur
(Raj).
2. Chenaram Son Of Jetharam, Aged About 31
Years, Resident Of Village Nosariya, Post
Kamediya, Tehsil Jayal, District Nagaur (Raj).
Presently Residing At C/o Chhoturam Son Of
Jeenaram, Address 350, Vijay Nagar,
Daulatpura, Bainad Road, Jhotwara, Jaipur
(Raj).
----Petitioners
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary,
Department Of Home, Government
Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. The Commissioner Of Police,
Commissionerate, Jaipur.
3. The Deputy Commissioner Of Police, Jaipur
City (West), Jaipur.
4. Sho, Police Station Harmada, Jaipur City
(West), Jaipur.
5. Superintendent Of Police, Churu, District
Churu, Raj.
6. Superintendent Of Police, Nagaur, District
Nagaur (Raj).
7. Sho, Police Station Sujangarh, District Churu
(Raj).
8. Sho Police Station Burdifanta, District Nagaur
(Downloaded on 11/11/2023 at 07:44:50 PM)
[2023:RJ-JP:20593] (2 of 4) [CRLW-1913/2023]
(Raj).
9. Meghu Ram Nayak Son Of Ashuram, Nayak,
Resident Of Vpo- Bhasina, Tehsil Sujangarh,
District Churu (Raj).
10. Jhumi Devi W/o Meghu Ram, Resident Of Vpo-
Bhasina, Tehsil Sujangarh, District Churu
(Raj).
11. Ratti Ram Nayak Son Of Meghuram, Resident
Of Vpo- Bhasina, Tehsil Sujangarh, District
Churu (Raj).
12. Lalaram Son Of Meghuram, Resident Of Vpo-
Bhasina, Tehsil Sujangarh, District Churu
(Raj).
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Brijesh Kumar Bhardwaj, Adv.
For : Mr. Yashwant Kankhediya, P.P. Respondent(s) HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS Judgment / Order 02/09/2023 The petitioners have preferred the present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of necessary directions to the respondent authorities to provide adequate security and protection to them, as they are facing grave threat of life and liberty at the hands of private respondent(s).
(Downloaded on 11/11/2023 at 07:44:50 PM) [2023:RJ-JP:20593] (3 of 4) [CRLW-1913/2023] Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are of major age and they solemnized their marriage of their own free will. However, their family members are not agreeable to their marriage and have threatened them of dire consequences.
He prays that adequate police protection be provided to them.
Though no specific instance or imminent threat has been pleaded but considering the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioners and having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is of the opinion that if the petitioners are having any apprehension or threat perception about their life and liberty from their relatives, they may move appropriate representation before the S.H.O., Police Station Harmada, Jaipur City (West), Jaipur indicating their concern with the name(s) of probable assailants.
If any such representation is moved by the petitioners, the S.H.O., Police Station Harmada, Jaipur City (West), Jaipur shall consider the same and after analysing the factual situation pass necessary orders or take action to ward off any untoward incident.
(Downloaded on 11/11/2023 at 07:44:50 PM)
[2023:RJ-JP:20593] (4 of 4) [CRLW-1913/2023] It is hereby clarified that this order may not be construed to be a validation of petitioners' marriage and proof of their age. Any observation made herein shall not affect any criminal or civil proceedings initiated against the petitioners, at the instance of their relatives.
With these observations, this criminal writ petition is disposed of.
The stay application also stands disposed of accordingly.
(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J DANISH USMANI /554 (Downloaded on 11/11/2023 at 07:44:50 PM) Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)