Bulkesh D/O Jai Singh vs State Of Rajasthan ...

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 4502 Raj/2
Judgement Date : 2 September, 2023

Rajasthan High Court
Bulkesh D/O Jai Singh vs State Of Rajasthan ... on 2 September, 2023
Bench: Uma Shanker Vyas
[2023:RJ-JP:20607]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
            BENCH AT JAIPUR

       S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 1986/2023

1.     Bulkesh D/o Jai Singh, Aged About 22 Years,
       R/o Village Kaliyasar, Police Station Malsisar,
       District Jhunjhunu (Raj).
2.     Rakesh Budania S/o Sh. Mahendra Singh,
       Aged About 22 Years, R/o Ardawata, Police
       Station Chidawa, District Jhunjhunu (Raj).
                                                         ----Petitioners
                                  Versus
1.     State          Of       Rajasthan,         Through         Public
       Prosecutor.
2.     The Superintendent Of Police, Jhunjhunu.
3.     S.h.o.         Police      Station       Malsisar,        District
       Jhunjhunu.
4.     S.h.o.     ,     Police     Station      Chidawa,         District
       Jhunjhunu.
5.     Rakesh Kumar Kulhari S/o Sh. Ramswaroop
       Kulhari, R/o Village Badki, Police Station
       Dudwa Khara District Churu.
6.     Jai   Singh          S/o   Sh.    Lekhram,          R/o   Village
       Kaliyasar District Jhunjhunu (Raj).
7.     Mohan          Lal    Bijarniya      S/o     Sh.      Ramkaran
       Bijarniya, R/o Village Hansasari, Tehsil Alsisar,
       District Jhunjhunu.
8.     Pratap Budaniya S/o Sh. Piranaram, R/o
       Ardawata, District Jhunjhunu (Raj).
                                                   ----Respondents

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mukesh Dudi, Adv. For : Mr. Yashwant Kankhediya, P.P. Respondent(s) (Downloaded on 11/11/2023 at 07:44:56 PM) [2023:RJ-JP:20607] (2 of 3) [CRLW-1986/2023] HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS Judgment / Order 02/09/2023 The petitioners have preferred the present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of necessary directions to the respondent authorities to provide adequate security and protection to them, as they are facing grave threat to their life and liberty at the hands of private respondent(s).

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are above 18 years of age and are in a live-in-relationship. But such relationship is not acceptable to their family members/society and they have threatened them of dire consequences.

He prays that adequate police protection be provided to them.

Though no specific instance or imminent threat has been pleaded but considering the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioners and having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is of the opinion that if the petitioners are having any apprehension or threat perception about their life and liberty from their relatives, they may move appropriate representation (Downloaded on 11/11/2023 at 07:44:56 PM) [2023:RJ-JP:20607] (3 of 3) [CRLW-1986/2023] before the Superintendent of Police, Jhunjhunu indicating their concern with the name(s) of probable assailants.

If any such representation is moved by the petitioners, the Superintendent of Police, Jhunjhunu shall consider the same and after analysing the factual situation pass necessary orders or take action to ward off any untoward incident.

It is hereby clarified that this order may not be construed to be a validation of petitioners' live-in relationship and proof of their age. Any observation made herein shall not affect any criminal or civil proceedings initiated against the petitioners, at the instance of their relatives.

With these observations, this criminal writ petition is disposed of.

The stay application also stands disposed of accordingly.

(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J DANISH USMANI /563 (Downloaded on 11/11/2023 at 07:44:56 PM) Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)