The State Of Rajasthan vs Bhera Ram (2023:Rj-Jd:36824)

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 8885 Raj
Judgement Date : 31 October, 2023

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur
The State Of Rajasthan vs Bhera Ram (2023:Rj-Jd:36824) on 31 October, 2023
Bench: Dinesh Mehta

[2023:RJ-JD:36824] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Review Petition (Writ) No. 39/2023

1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Public Health Engineering Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur

2. The Chief Engineer, Public Health Engineering Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur

3. The Superintending Engineer, Public Health Engineering Department, Circle Nagaur, District Nagaur

4. The Assistant Engineer, Public Health Engineering Department, City Sub Division Nagaur, District Nagaur

----Petitioners Versus Bhera Ram S/o Shri Balu Ram, Village Bhadwasi District- Nagaur.

                                                                   ----Respondent


For Petitioner(s)             :    Ms. Anjana Jawa
For Respondent(s)             :    -



                          JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA

                                       Order

31/10/2023

1. The present review petition is directed against the order dated 25.03.2021, passed by this Court in writ petition filed by the respondent.

2. A perusal of the order under consideration reveals that though learned counsel for the petitioners therein had placed reliance on the judgment rendered in case of Sohanlal Mathur Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.: S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.3631/2008, decided on 17.11.2008, which has been affirmed by the Apex Court in SLP (Civil) No.14932/2012, while disposing of the writ (Downloaded on 12/11/2023 at 08:15:15 AM) [2023:RJ-JD:36824] (2 of 2) [WRW-39/2023] petition, this Court has not given any finding about petitioner's case being covered by the judgments relied upon and has only directed the present petitioners to consider respondent's representation in terms of the judgment rendered in the case of Sohan Lal (supra).

3. Hence, this Court does not find any error apparent on the face of the record because rights of the respondent have not been decided. Obviously, the petitioners shall be free to decide respondent's representation in accordance with law while considering the referred judgment.

4. The review petition is, therefore, dismissed.

(DINESH MEHTA),J 8-Ramesh/-

(Downloaded on 12/11/2023 at 08:15:15 AM) Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)