[2023:RJ-JD:36820] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Review Petition (Writ) No. 61/2021
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Public Health And Engineering Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur.
2. The Chief Engineer (Rural), Public Health And Engineering Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur. (Raj.)
3. The Superintending Engineer, Public Health And Engineering Department, Circle Nagaur, Nagaur (Raj.).
4. The Executive Engineer, Public Health And Engineering Department, Division Merta City, Dist. Nagaur (Raj.).
----Petitioners Versus Kan Singh Chouhan S/o Ram Singh Chouhan, Aged About 67 Years, R/o Village Post Sathana Khurd, Tehsil (Riya Bari), Dist. Nagaur (Raj) Presently Working At Water Supply Scheme Padu Kalla, Tehsil Merta City, Dist. Nagaur
----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Anjana Jawa For Respondent(s) : -
JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA Order 31/10/2023
1. The present review petition is directed against the order dated 25.03.2021, passed by this Court in writ petition filed by the respondent.
2. A perusal of the order under consideration reveals that though learned counsel for the petitioners therein had placed reliance on the judgment rendered in case of Sohanlal Mathur Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.: S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.3631/2008, decided on 17.11.2008, which has been affirmed by the Apex (Downloaded on 12/11/2023 at 08:15:14 AM) [2023:RJ-JD:36820] (2 of 2) [WRW-61/2021] Court in SLP (Civil) No.14932/2012, while disposing of the writ petition, this Court has not given any finding about petitioner's case being covered by the judgments relied upon and has only directed the present petitioners to consider respondent's representation in terms of the judgment rendered in the case of Sohan Lal (supra).
3. Hence, this Court does not find any error apparent on the face of the record because rights of the respondent have not been decided. Obviously, the petitioners shall be free to decide respondent's representation in accordance with law while considering the referred judgment.
4. The review petition is, therefore, dismissed.
(DINESH MEHTA),J 1-Ramesh/-
(Downloaded on 12/11/2023 at 08:15:14 AM) Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)