Guddi Keer D/O Kanhiya Lal vs State Of Rajasthan ...

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 5632 Raj/2
Judgement Date : 6 October, 2023

Rajasthan High Court
Guddi Keer D/O Kanhiya Lal vs State Of Rajasthan ... on 6 October, 2023
Bench: Uma Shanker Vyas
[2023:RJ-JP:27365]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
            BENCH AT JAIPUR

       S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 2142/2023

1.     Guddi Keer D/o Kanhiya Lal, Aged About 25
       Years, R/o Siswali, Tehsil Baran, Distt. Baran
       (Raj).
2.     Vikas Keer S/o Jagdish Keer, Aged About 22
       Years, R/o Keer Mohalla Dhuan Kalan, Tehsil
       Dhuni, Distt. Tonk (Raj).
                                                         ----Petitioners
                                Versus
1.     State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.
2.     Superintendent Of Police, Tonk.
3.     Officer In-Charge, Siswali Thana., Baran
4.     Officer In-Charge, Ghad Thana., Tonk.
5.     Kanhiya Lal S/o Hira Lal, Aged About 60
       Years,     R/o      Kuwad,        P.s.    Indragarh,       Distt.
       Bundi.
6.     Ranglal S/o Kanhiya Lal, Aged About 25 Years,
       R/o Kuwad, P.s Indragarh, Distt Bundi.
7.     Kali W/o Kanhiya Lal, Aged About 55 Years,
       R/o Kuwad, P.s Indragarh, Distt Bundi.
8.     Kishan Lal S/o Prakash, Aged About 24 Years,
       R/o Siswali, Tehsil Baran, Distt. Baran.
9.     Pappu S/o Kalu, Aged About 40 Years, R/o
       Siswali Tehsil Baran, Distt. Baran.
10.    Kanta W/o Prakash, Aged About 41 Years, R/o
       Siswali Tehsil Baran, Distt. Baran.
                                                   ----Respondents
For Petitioner(s)        : None
For                      : Mr. Bhawani Shankar Sharma,
Respondent(s)              P.P.




             (Downloaded on 11/11/2023 at 08:35:21 PM)
                                    [2023:RJ-JP:27365]              (2 of 2)                 [CRLW-2142/2023]


HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS Judgment / Order 06/10/2023 No one is present on behalf of petitioners. Petitioners have preferred this petition seeking protection of life and liberty.

From perusal of the record, it is revealed that Petitioner No.1 is already married. A live-in- relationship between a married and unmarried person is not permissible.

The pre-requities for a live-in-relationship as held by the Apex Court in "D.Velusamy vs. D. Patchaiammal (2010) 10SCC 469" is that the couple must hold themselves out to society as being akin to spouses and must be of legal age to marry or qualified to enter into a legal marriage, including being unmarried.

Considering all the factual position, this petition is liable to be dismissed. Hence, the criminal writ petition is accordingly dismissed.

Stay application stands disposed.

(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J DANISH USMANI /533 (Downloaded on 11/11/2023 at 08:35:21 PM) Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)