Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur
Sumitra vs State Of Rajasthan (2023:Rj-Jd:40145) on 22 November, 2023
Author: Kuldeep Mathur
Bench: Kuldeep Mathur
[2023:RJ-JD:40145]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 18135/2023
1. Sumitra W/o Sh. Jeewan Ram, Aged About 33 Years, R/o
Gram Post Bhanwal, Jasnagar, Nagaur, Rajasthan.
2. Jeewan Ram S/o Sh. Sita Ram, Aged About 38 Years, R/o
Gram Post Bhanwal, Jasnagar, Nagaur, Rajasthan.
3. Pappu Ram S/o Sh. Sona Ram, Aged About 20 Years, R/o
Jasnathpura, Post Birloka, Tehsil Khinwsar, Nagaur,
Rajasthan.
----Petitioners
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Social Justice
And Empowerment, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur.
2. The Director, Department Of Social Justice And
Empowerment, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur.
3. The Deputy Director, Department Of Social Justice And
Empowerment, Jodhpur.
4. The Deputy Director, Department Of Social Justice And
Empowerment, Pali.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Deepak Bora
For Respondent(s) : Mr. A.K. Gaur
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP MATHUR
Order 22/11/2023 Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the controversy involved in the present writ petition is squarely covered by the judgment of this Court rendered in a bunch of writ petitions led by S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.372/2013 (Anokh Bai Vs. State of Raj. & Ors).
(Downloaded on 22/11/2023 at 08:42:42 PM)
[2023:RJ-JD:40145] (2 of 2) [CW-18135/2023] In view of the aforesaid, the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the petitioners to file a representation within two weeks along with a certified copy of the order instant and a copy of the judgment in the case of Anokh Bai (supra) to the respondents.
On receipt of the representation along with the certified copy of the order instant, the respondents shall decide the same within a period of eight weeks, in accordance with law including the law laid down in Anokh Bai's case.
It is made clear that aforesaid direction to decide the representation has been issued only with a view to ensure expeditious redressal of petitioners' grievance. The same may not be construed to be an order to decide the representation in a particular manner.
(KULDEEP MATHUR),J 60-Hanuman/-
(Downloaded on 22/11/2023 at 08:42:42 PM) Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)