State Of Rajasthan vs Mana Ram Choudhary

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 80 Raj
Judgement Date : 4 January, 2023

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur
State Of Rajasthan vs Mana Ram Choudhary on 4 January, 2023
Bench: Dinesh Mehta

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Review Petition (Writ) No. 95/2021

1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Public Health And Engineering Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur.

2. The Chief Engineer (Administration), Public Health And Engineering Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur.

3. The Superintending Engineer, Public Health And Engineering Department, Circle Barmer, Barmer (Raj.).

4. The Assistant Engineer, Public Health And Engineering Department, Sub Division Baitu, District Barmer (Raj.).

----Petitioners Versus Mana Ram Choudhary S/o Harchand Choudhary, Aged About 68 Years, By Caste Jat, Resident Of Vpo Madpura, Barwala, Tehsil Baitu, District Barmer (Raj.)

----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Anjana Jawa JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA Order 04/01/2023

1. The present review petition is directed against the order dated 25.03.2021, passed by this Court in writ petition filed by the respondent.

2. A perusal of the order under consideration reveals that though, learned counsel for the respondent had placed reliance on the judgment rendered in case of Sohanlal Mathur Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.: S.B.Civil Writ Petition No.3631/2008, decided on 17.11.2008, which has been affirmed by the Apex Court in SLP (Civil)No.14932/2012, while disposing of the writ (Downloaded on 04/01/2023 at 08:57:37 PM) (2 of 2) [WRW-95/2021] petition, this Court has not given any finding about the respondent's case being covered by the judgments relied upon and has only directed the present petitioners to consider respondent's representation in terms of the judgment rendered in the case of Sohan Lal (supra).

3. Hence, this Court does not find any error apparent on the face of the record because rights of the respondent have not been decided. Obviously, the petitioners shall be free to decide respondent's representation in accordance with law while considering the referred judgment.

4. The review petition is, therefore, dismissed.

(DINESH MEHTA),J 135-Inder/-

(Downloaded on 04/01/2023 at 08:57:37 PM) Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)