Aamb Singh vs The State Of Rajasthan

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 17698/2022 Aamb Singh S/o Mohan Singh, Aged About 37 Years, R/o Ramdev Mandir Ke Samne, Nakoda Road, Jasol, District Barmer. At Present Working Phc Thob Block Kalyanpur, Dist. Barmer.

----Petitioner Versus

1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Medical And Health Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.

2. Director, (Public Health) Medical And Health Services, Rajasthan, Swasthya Bhawan, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.

3. Nodal Officer, Mndy/mnjy, Medical And Health Services, Rajasthan, Swasthya Bhawan, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.

4. Chief Medical And Health Officer, Barmer.

5. Block Chief Medical And Health Officer, Kalyanpur, District Barmer.

                                                                   ----Respondents


For Petitioner(s)          :     Mr. Gulab Singh
For Respondent(s)          :     -



                     JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA

                                     Order

02/01/2023

1.   Learned     counsel       for   the     petitioner          submits   that   the

petitioner would feel satisfied if a direction be issued to consider their representation in the light of judgment dated 20.03.2017 rendered by this Court in a bunch of writ petitions led by Pankaj Kumar Upadhyay & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.: S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 953/2017.

(2 of 2) [CW-17698/2022]

2. In view of the aforesaid, the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the petitioner to file a representation within a period of four weeks from today.

3. In case, a representation is so addressed within the aforesaid period, the respondents shall consider and decide the same in accordance with law including the law laid down by this Court in the case of Pankaj Kumar Upadhyay (supra); however, in no case later than six weeks from the date of receipt of the representation.

4. It is made clear that aforesaid direction to decide the representation has been issued only with a view to ensure expeditious redressal of petitioner's grievance. The same may not be construed to be an order to decide the representation in a particular manner.

(DINESH MEHTA),J 183-akansha/-

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)