Kishore vs State Of Rajasthan

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 174 Raj
Judgement Date : 5 January, 2023

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur
Kishore vs State Of Rajasthan on 5 January, 2023
Bench: Dinesh Mehta

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14403/2021 Kishore S/o Mangatu Ram, Aged About 70 Years, By Caste Harijan, Resident Of 19, Panch Mouka Puliya, Harijan Basti, Pali (Raj.).

----Petitioner Versus

1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Department Of Local Self Government, Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan.

2. The Executive Officer, Municipal Board, Pali (Raj.).

3. The Director, Directorate Of Pension And Pensioners Welfare Department, Jaipur (Raj.).

4. Joint Director, Pension And Pensioners Welfare Department, Jodhpur (Raj.).

----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Lokesh Mathur For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rajesh Parihar Mr. Ravi Panwar JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA Order 05/01/2023 I.A.No.01/2022:-

For the reasons stated, the application seeking early hearing of the case is allowed.

The matter is taken up for consideration today itself. S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14403/2021

1. The petitioner has approached this Court with a grievance that in spite of the fact that petitioner has retired ten years ago, his pension case has not been processed. (Downloaded on 05/01/2023 at 08:59:15 PM)

(2 of 2) [CW-14403/2021]

2. The facts that have come on record are that the petitioner was initially convicted under Section 302 of Indian Penal Code by learned Sessions Judge, Pali per viam judgment dated 01.11.2003 whereafter his appeal was allowed by the High Court and the conviction was overturned by the order dated 21.04.2010.

3. The respondents are not processing petitioner's case and insisting upon the petitioner to bring a certificate of 'no appeal'.

4. Mr. Mathur, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner cannot produce such a certificate as no law provides for such certificate. He however asserts that no appeal has been filed against the order of acquittal passed by the High Court on 21.04.2010.

5. Mr. Ravi Panwar, learned AGC appearing on behalf of the Pension Department frankly submits that the respondents have enquired at their own level, so also from the concerned Municipal Board, Pali and it has been informed that no appeal has been preferred against the order of the High Court.

6. In view of the aforesaid, the present petition stands disposed of with a direction to the respondents to process the petitioner's pension case in accordance with law as early as possible, preferably within a period of three months from today.

(DINESH MEHTA),J 121-akansha/-

(Downloaded on 05/01/2023 at 08:59:15 PM) Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)