Vinod Kumar S/O Shri Kalulal vs Smt. Hasiran Bano W/O Ahmad Noor ...

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 1468 Raj/2
Judgement Date : 3 February, 2023

Rajasthan High Court
Vinod Kumar S/O Shri Kalulal vs Smt. Hasiran Bano W/O Ahmad Noor ... on 3 February, 2023
Bench: Mahendar Kumar Goyal
       HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
                   BENCH AT JAIPUR

                S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 12338/2020

Smt. Anju Jain W/o Kamal Kumar Poddar
                                                                     ----Petitioner
                                     Versus
Smt. Hasiran Bano W/o Ahmad Noor Ansari & Ors.
                                                                  ----Respondents

Connected With S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 12339/2020 Vinod Kumar S/o Shri Kalulal

----Petitioner Versus Smt. Hasiran Bano W/o Ahmad Noor Ansari

----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. A.R. Meena For Respondent(s) : Mr. Kuldeep Aswal Mr. Sandeep Sharma HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL Order 03/02/2023 Since, these writ petitions share common facts and questions of law, they have been heard together.

Prayer in the writ petitions is to quash and set aside the order dated 15.12.2014 passed by the Additional District Collector, Bundi whereby, the appeals preferred by the respondent No.1 against the grant of Patta by the respondents No.2 & 3, Nagar Palika Nainwa, District Bundi in favour of the petitioners, have been allowed.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the Additional District Collector, Bundi did not have jurisdiction to entertain the appeals preferred by the respondent No.1 against (Downloaded on 05/02/2023 at 12:14:50 AM) (2 of 2) [CW-12338/2020] the allotment of the subject plot in their favour by the Nagar Palika Nainwa, District Bundi which could lay before the Director, Local Bodies only. He, therefore, prays that the writ petition be allowed and the order dated 15.12.2014 be quashed and set aside.

After making submission for some time, learned counsels for the respondents pray for an adjournment.

In view thereof, learned counsel for the petitioners prays for an interim order.

List these matters after four weeks as prayed by learned counsels for the respondents.

However, to balance equities, this Court deems it just and proper to stay the operation and effect of the judgment dated 15.12.2014 passed by the Additional District Collector, Bundi which, on the face of it, appears prima facie to be without jurisdiction, till the next date.

(MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL),J Manish/98-99 (Downloaded on 05/02/2023 at 12:14:50 AM) Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)