Suresh Nayak Son Of Shri Ramkishan ... vs State Of Rajasthan ...

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 1460 Raj/2
Judgement Date : 3 February, 2023

Rajasthan High Court
Suresh Nayak Son Of Shri Ramkishan ... vs State Of Rajasthan ... on 3 February, 2023
Bench: Ganesh Ram Meena
[2023/RJJP/001440]

        HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
                    BENCH AT JAIPUR

 S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 131/2023

Suresh Nayak Son Of Shri Ramkishan @ Bodan Nayak ( Bhopa),
Aged About 30 Years, Resident Of Bhopakapura, Pahadi, Police
Station Balghat, District Karauli (Raj.) ( At Present Accused
Petitioner Confined In Sub Jail Hindaun District Karauli)
                                                                   ----Petitioner
                                    Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.
                                                                 ----Respondent
For Petitioner(s)          :    Mr. Ram Ratan Gurjar
For Respondent(s)          :    Mr. Deepak Sharma
For State                  :    Mr. Mahendra Meena, PP



          HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA

                          Judgment / Order

03/02/2023

1. This bail application has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

2. F.I.R. No.0239/2022 was registered at Police Station Balghat, District Karauli for the offence/s mentioned therein.

3. It is contended by counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case as he has nothing to do with the alleged incident. The incident is stated to be taken place on 03.07.2022, whereas, F.I.R. was lodged on 24.07.2022, after a delay of about 21 days. The petitioner is behind the bars since 24.11.2022 and no purpose will be served in keeping him behind the bars. Further detention of the petitioner is not warranted for interrogation and recovery purposes. Trial of the case is likely to take considerable time.

(Downloaded on 07/02/2023 at 12:35:42 AM)

[2023/RJJP/001440] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-131/2023]

4. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.

5. I have considered the contentions.

6. Considering the contentions put forth by counsel for the petitioner(s) but without making any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, I deem it proper to allow the bail application.

7. This bail application is, accordingly, allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner shall be released on bail provided he/she/each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the trial Court with the stipulation that he/she/each of them shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter be transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

(GANESH RAM MEENA),J ARTI SHARMA /99 (Downloaded on 07/02/2023 at 12:35:42 AM) Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)