Smt Nana And Ors vs Jagtar Singh And Ors

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 4174 Raj/2
Judgement Date : 1 June, 2022

Rajasthan High Court
Smt Nana And Ors vs Jagtar Singh And Ors on 1 June, 2022
Bench: Anoop Kumar Dhand
      HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
                  BENCH AT JAIPUR

          S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 87/2001

1. Smt. Nana w/o Kailash Chandra, aged about 19 years.
2. Manoj S/o Lt. Sh. Kailash Chandra, aged 6 months, minor
through mother and natural guardian Smt. Nana
3. Sh. Kalyan Sahai s/o Sh. Narayan Lal, aged 40 years (Died)
4. Smt. Kamla Devi w/o Sh. Kalyan Sahai, aged 35 years.
5. Choti w/o Sh. Narayan Lal, aged 55 years (died)
6. Kalu Ram s/o Sh. Kalyan Sahai, aged 13 years.
7. Mahadev son of Sh. Kalyan Sahai, aged 10 years.
8 Ku. Indra d/o Sh. Kalyan Sahai, aged 14 years.
9. Radha d/o Sh. Kalyan Sahai, aged 8 years.
  All resident of Keria-ka-bas, (Bagru Tehsil Sanganer, District
Jaipur)
                                                   ----claimants/Appellants
                                  Versus
1. Tejendra Pal Singh son of Sh. Gurjit Singh, resident of
Chandrabhushanpura, Tehsil Dhanesar, District Kucheter (KKP),
Kurukshetra, Haryana.
2. The New India Assurance Company Limited, Regional Office,
Nehru Place, Tonk Road, Jaipur.
                                               ----Respondent/defendants

Connected With S.B. Cross Objection (Civil) No. 44/2001

1. Smt. Nana w/o Kailash Chandra, aged about 19 years.

2. Manoj S/o Lt. Sh. Kailash Chandra, aged 6 months, minor through mother and natural guardian Smt. Nana

3. Sh. Kalyan Sahai s/o Sh. Narayan Lal, aged 40 years (Died)

4. Smt. Kamla Devi w/o Sh. Kalyan Sahai, aged 35 years.

5. Choti w/o Sh. Narayan Lal, aged 55 years (died)

6. Kalu Ram s/o Sh. Kalyan Sahai, aged 13 years.

7. Mahadev son of Sh. Kalyan Sahai, aged 10 years. 8 Ku. Indra d/o Sh. Kalyan Sahai, aged 14 years.

9. Radha d/o Sh. Kalyan Sahai, aged 8 years. All resident of Keria-ka-bas, (Bagru Tehsil Sanganer, District Jaipur)

----Claimants/Appellants Versus (Downloaded on 08/06/2022 at 08:08:08 PM) (2 of 3) [CMA-87/2001]

1. Jagtar Singh son of Karnail Singh resident of H. No.270, Shastri Colony, Karnal, PS Karnal Haryana.

2. Tejendra Pal Singh son of Sh. Gurjit Singh, resident of Chandrabhushanpura, Tehsil Dhanesar, District Kucheter (KKP), Kurukshetra, Haryana.

2. The New India Assurance Company Limited, Regional Office, Nehru Place, Tonk Road, Jaipur.

----Defendant/Respondents For Appellant(s) : Mr. Rakesh Bhargava For Respondent(s) : Mr. Ram Singh Rathore-Insurance Company HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 01/06/2022 An oral request/prayer has been made by the counsel appearing for the respondent No.2-Insurance Company that the words "Insurance Company" in the second and third lines on the top of page No.7 in the Judgment dated 26.05.2022 passed by this Court in S.B. Civil Misc. Appeal No.87/2001 be ordered to be corrected as the aforesaid words have been typed due to typographical error.

Further prayer has been made by the counsel that the words "Insurance Company" in line Nos.2 and 3 on the top of page No.7 of the judgment dated 26.05.2022 in the aforementioned appeal be ordered to be read as "respondent No.1" and the typographical error in the aforesaid judgment may kindly be corrected to the aforesaid extent.

(Downloaded on 08/06/2022 at 08:08:08 PM)

(3 of 3) [CMA-87/2001] Prayer when read with the aforesaid judgment appears to be innocuous. Therefore, the aforesaid typographical error is corrected in the aforesaid judgment in 'red ink' and necessary corrections are also made in the web copy of the aforesaid judgment.

The order passed today shall be treated as part and parcel of the judgment dated 26.05.2022 passed by this Court.

(ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Sharma NK/-

(Downloaded on 08/06/2022 at 08:08:08 PM)

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)