S.S.M. College vs State Of Rajasthan

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 5605 Raj
Judgement Date : 18 April, 2022

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur
S.S.M. College vs State Of Rajasthan on 18 April, 2022
Bench: Vijay Bishnoi

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5396/2022 S.S.M. College, Changoi Road, Taranagar, District Churu, Through Secretary, Shish Ram S/o Shri Rugha Ram, Aged About 45 Years, Shri Laxmi Group Welfare Trust (Management Body), Sidhmukh, District Churu.

----Petitioner Versus

1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Director, Animal Husbandry Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur.

2. Deputy Secretary To The Government Of Rajasthan, Department Of Animal Husbandry, Secretariat, Jaipur.

3. Rajasthan University Of Veterinary And Animal Sciences, Bikaner, Through Its Registrar, Rajasthan University Of Veterinary And Animal Sciences, Bikaner, District Bikaner.

----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sajjan Singh Rathore HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAY BISHNOI Order 18/04/2022 Learned counsel for the petitioner-institution submits that the controversy involved in the present writ petition has already been decided by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in the case of Professor S Karan Shiksha Samiti Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. (S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.24692/2018 decided on 09.04.2019).

Learned counsel for the petitioner-institution submits that the issue involved in this writ petition is no more res-integra in (Downloaded on 18/04/2022 at 08:23:16 PM) (2 of 3) [CW-5396/2022] view of the adjudication by a Constitution Bench of the Apex Court of the land in the case of Islamic Academy of Education Vs. State of Karnataka : 2003 (6) SCC 679, which reads thus:

"25. Privately managed educational institutions imparting professional education in the fields of (33) medicine, dentistry and engineering have spurted in the last few decades. The right of the minorities to establish an institution of their own choice in terms of clause(1) of Article 30 of the Constitution of India is recognized; so is the right of a citizen who intends to establish an institution under Article 19(1)(g) thereof. However, the fundamental right of a citizen to establish an educational institution and in particular a professional institution is not absolute. These rights are subject to regulations and laws imposing reasonable restrictions. Such reasonable restriction in public interest can be imposed under Clause (6) of Article 19 and regulations under Article 30 of the Constitution of India. The right to establish an educational institution, although guaranteed under the Constitution, recognition of affiliation is not. Recognition or affiliation of professional institution must be in terms of statute."

Learned counsel for the petitioner-institution submits that the petitioner-institution will file the detail representation before the respondents within a period of fifteen days from today and the respondents may be directed to consider its representation in the light of the judgment passed by the Co-ordinate Bench at Jaipur in case of Professor S Karan Shiksha Samiti Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. (S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.24692/2018 decided on 09.04.2019).

In view of submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner-institution, respondent is directed to decide the representation of the petitioner-institution in accordance with law (Downloaded on 18/04/2022 at 08:23:16 PM) (3 of 3) [CW-5396/2022] preferably within a period of two months from the date of receiving representation along with certified copy of this order.

The writ petition as well as stay petition are disposed of.

(VIJAY BISHNOI),J Abhishek Kumar S.No.62 (Downloaded on 18/04/2022 at 08:23:16 PM) Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)