Nandkishor Mali vs The State Of Rajasthan

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 15557 Raj
Judgement Date : 6 October, 2021

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur
Nandkishor Mali vs The State Of Rajasthan on 6 October, 2021
Bench: Arun Bhansali

(1 of 2) [CW-14033/2021] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14033/2021 Nandkishor Mali S/o Ramnarayan Mali, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Ward No. 5 Maliyo Ka Mohalla Jhajawar Bundi.

----Petitioner Versus

1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary To Education Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.).

2. The Director, Elementary Education, Bikaner (Raj.).

3. The District Education Officer, Secondary Education (Headquarter) Bundi (Raj.).

4. The District Education Officer, Elementary Education, (Headquarter) Bundi.

----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Shreekant Verma. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Hemant Chouhdary.

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN BHANSALI Order 06/10/2021 Learned counsel for the petitioner submit that the controversy involved in this writ petition is akin to one decided by this Court in bunch of cases led by Prem Bai Meena Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. : SB Civil Writ Petition No.11136/2017 decided by Jaipur Bench on 24.07.2017.

Learned counsel for the respondents, is not in a position to dispute the aforesaid position of facts and law.

The petitioner is directed to furnish a representation in light of guidelines dated 24.08.2021 or any other applicable guideline/circular before the concerned District Education Officer (Downloaded on 07/10/2021 at 08:34:06 PM) (2 of 2) [CW-14033/2021] within a period of one week, along with photo-stat copy of the guideline/circular and certified copy of the order instant. The petitioner may also point out any vacant post in his district and judgment, which he wishes to rely upon.

In case, a representation is so addressed within the aforesaid period, the competent authority of respondent shall consider and decide the same in accordance with law as early as possible, preferably within a period of two weeks.

Until petitioner's representation is decided, the petitioner shall be permitted to discharge his duties at present place of posting (before passing of the impugned order).

It is made clear that aforesaid direction to decide there presentation has been issued only with a view to ensure expeditious redressal of petitioner's grievance. The same may not be construed to be an order to decide the representation in a particular manner.

The writ petition as well as stay application stand disposed of accordingly.

(ARUN BHANSALI),J 247-pradeep/-

(Downloaded on 07/10/2021 at 08:34:06 PM) Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)