Nishchay Mahajan vs State Of Punjab

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 4019 P&H
Judgement Date : 30 April, 2026

[Cites 3, Cited by 0]

Punjab-Haryana High Court

Nishchay Mahajan vs State Of Punjab on 30 April, 2026

           115             IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
                                        AT CHANDIGARH

                                                                        CRM-M-24092-2026
                                                                 Date of decision: 30.04.2026
           NISHCHAY MAHAJAN
                                                                            ...PETITIONER
                                            V/S
           STATE OF PUNJAB
                                                                           ...RESPONDENT
           CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBHAS MEHLA
           Present:            Mr. Rishab Bhandari, Advocate;
                               Mr. Mehtab Singh, Advocate and
                               Mr. Harnoor Singh, Advocate
                               for the petitioner.

                               Mr. Anup Singh, AAG, Punjab.
                                     ****

           SUBHAS MEHLA, J. (ORAL)

1. Through the instant petition filed under Section 482 Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, prayer is for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners in case bearing FIR No.17 dated 26.03.2026 registered under Sections 67-B of the Information Technology Act, 2000 (for short 'IT Act') at Punjab State Cyber Crime, SAS Nagar, Mohali.

2. Allegations against the present petitioner are that he as the user/operator of a Google Drive account, wherein Child Sexual Exploitative and Abuse Material (CSEAM) was uploaded and stored. During preliminary inquiry, around 150 videos containing such illegal content were found linked to the account of the present petitioner and associated recovery mobile number was registered in the name of his mother, attracting a prima facie offence under Section 67-B of the IT Act. Hence, the present FIR was registered. MANISHA 2026.05.06 18:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-24092-2026 2

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for discretionary relief of anticipatory bail to the petitioner on the following grounds :

i. Maximum punishment provided under Section 67-B of IT Act is upto 05 years.
ii. Co-accused, namely, Sarita i.e. mother of petitioner, who is registered owner of the SIM in question, has already been granted the concession of interim anticipatory bail by this Court vide order dated 16.04.2026 passed in CRM-M No.20619 of 2026 (Annexure P-2).
iii. Petitioner is ready to join the investigation and co-operate with the investigating agency by handing over his mobile phone and other device, if any, required by the investigating agency.
iv. Petitioner is a 22 years old student, having clean and clear antecedents and is not involved in any other case.

4. Learned State counsel appeared on advance notice and submitted the following facts :

i. Investigation is going on and co-accused has not joined the investigation.
ii. For further investigation, the investigating agency requires the device/mobile phone of the petitioner and iii. Fairly admitted that petitioner has not been nominated as accused in the present FIR.

5. Heard.

MANISHA 2026.05.06 18:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-24092-2026 3

6. Keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case and contentions of learned counsel for the parties, this Court finds merit in the present petition on the following grounds :

i. The allegations against the petitioner are regarding downloading the objectionable material in his google drive. ii. Co-accused, namely, Sarita has already been granted the concession of interim anticipatory bail by this Court vide order dated 16.04.2026 passed in CRM-M No.20619 of 2026 (Annexure P-2).
iii. Petitioner is ready to join the investigation and co-operate with the investigating agency by handing over his mobile phone and other device, if any, required by the investigating agency and iv. He is having clean and clear antecedents and is not involved in any other criminal activities.

7. Accordingly, the present petition is allowed and the petitioner is directed to join the investigation as and when called upon to do so. In the event of his arrest, the petitioner shall be admitted to bail on furnishing bail/surety bonds to the satisfaction of investigating/arresting officer and shall also abide by the conditions as envisaged under Section 482(2) of the BNSS (erstwhile Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.).

8. Nothing observed hereinabove shall be construed to be expression of an opinion by this Court on merits of the case.


                                                                             (SUBHAS MEHLA)
           April 30, 2026                                                        JUDGE
           manisha
                               (i)     Whether speaking/reasoned              Yes/No
                               (ii)    Whether reportable                     Yes/No
MANISHA
2026.05.06 18:00
I attest to the accuracy and
integrity of this document