Punjab-Haryana High Court
Phoola Singh And Others vs State Of Punjab And Others on 19 October, 2024
APURVA
2024.10.21 15:22
I attest to the accuracy and
authenticity of this
document/judgment
High Court, Chandigarh
issued to respondent No.2 (Director, Department of Local Government,
Plot No.3, Sector-35A, Chandigarh) to consider and decide the aforesaid representation dated 05.09.2024 (Annexure P-11).
3. On advance service of copy of petition, Mr. Navneet Singh, Senior Deputy Advocate General, Punjab, appears on behalf of the respondents-State and opposes issuance of notice of motion. He further submits that respondent No.2 (Director, Department of Local Government, Plot No.3, Sector-35A, Chandigarh)/competent authority shall take decision either way, on the pending representation dated 05.09.2024 (Annexure P-11) within a period of six months from today.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners, keeping in view the aforesaid submissions made by learned counsel for the respondents-State, submits that she does not intend to press the instant writ petition any further, at this stage.
5. Keeping in view the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties and without commenting on the merits of the case, the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to No.2 (Director, Department of Local Government, Plot No.3, Sector-35A, Chandigarh)/competent authority to consider and decide representation dated 05.09.2024 (Annexure P-11) by way of passing a speaking order, after affording due opportunity of hearing to all the concerned parties, within a period of six months from today.
6. All the pending application(s), if any, shall also stand closed. APURVA 2024.10.21 15:22 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document/judgment High Court, Chandigarh