Vinod Kumar vs State Of Haryana And Anr

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 19213 P&H
Judgement Date : 23 October, 2024

Punjab-Haryana High Court

Vinod Kumar vs State Of Haryana And Anr on 23 October, 2024

                 CWP-28712-2024                                                                       -1-

                                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
                                                   AT CHANDIGARH


                 134                                                   CWP-28712-2024
                                                                       Date of Decision: 23.10.2024

                 Vinod Kumar                                                            ...Petitioner(s)


                                                              Versus


                 State of Haryana and another                                       ...Respondent(s)


                 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA

                 Present:-              Mr. Keshav Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner



                 TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA, J. (Oral)

The petition has been filed seeking a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to grant the petitioner the benefit of notional pay fixation and seniority by fixing his pay at par with the candidates given joining in the first list and arrears of pay from the date of actual joining.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance raised herein is pending for appropriate decision before the respondents. At this stage, the petitioner will be satisfied in case respondent No.2 is directed to decide the pending representation, dated 04.08.2024, Annexure P-4, in a specified period.

3. Notice of motion.

4. Mr. Krishan K. Chahal, Addl. AG, Haryana, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents/State and submits that the pending representation shall be decided by respondent No.2 expeditiously.

PAYAL 2024.10.24 16:28 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment CWP-28712-2024 -2-

5. In view thereof, without going into merits of the case, the petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2/Director Secondary Education, to consider and decide the pending representation, dated 04.08.2024, by passing a speaking order in accordance with law, within a period of three months from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order. In case the petitioner is found entitled to the benefits claimed, the same shall be released to him within a period of six weeks therefrom.

6. In case the order is not passed within the stipulated period, the officer concerned shall pay costs of ₹50,000 to the petitioner.





                                                                             (TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA)
                                                                                    JUDGE
                 23.10.2024
                 Payal
                                        Whether speaking/reasoned           Yes/No
                                        Whether reportable                  Yes/No




PAYAL
2024.10.24 16:28
I attest to the accuracy and
authenticity of this order/judgment