Punjab-Haryana High Court
Yogesh Chander vs State Of Haryana And Another on 23 October, 2024
CWP-28663-2024 -1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
131 CWP-28663-2024
Date of Decision: 23.10.2024
Yogesh Chander ...Petitioner(s)
Versus
State of Haryana and another ...Respondent(s)
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA
Present:- Mr. Ranjit Saini, Advocate for the petitioner
TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA, J. (Oral)
The petition has been filed seeking a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to consider the qualifying service rendered by the petitioner for the purpose of pension from the date of his appointment and not from the date of his contribution of provident fund and to pay the revised pension and arrears along with interest.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance raised herein is pending for appropriate decision before the respondents. At this stage, the petitioner will be satisfied in case respondent No.2 is directed to decide the pending legal notice, dated 09.09.2024, Annexure P-3, in a specified period.
3. Notice of motion.
4. Ms. Tanushree Gupta, DAG, Haryana, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents/State and submits that the pending legal notice, dated 09.09.2024, will be decided by the second respondent-Director Higher PAYAL 2024.10.24 16:28 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment CWP-28663-2024 -2- Education, by passing a speaking/reasoned order in accordance with law within a period of three months.
5. In view of the statement made, learned counsel for the petitioner has no objection to the petition being disposed of in terms thereof.
6. Ordered accordingly.
(TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA)
JUDGE
23.10.2024
Payal
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No
Whether reportable Yes/No
PAYAL
2024.10.24 16:28
I attest to the accuracy and
authenticity of this order/judgment