Punjab-Haryana High Court
Ranjit Singh vs Mulkh Raj on 24 October, 2024
Author: Alka Sarin
Bench: Alka Sarin
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
220 RSA-3313-1996 (O&M)
Date of Decision: 24.10.2024
RANJIT SINGH .... Appellant
VERSUS
MULKH RAJ AND ORS .... Respondents
CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN
Present : None.
ALKA SARIN, J. (ORAL)
1. The present appeal pertains to the year 1996. Vide order dated 01.12.2023 fresh notice was issued to the appellant as well as respondent No.1. As per the Office report, the sole appellant has since died. None has come forward to get themselves impleaded as his legal representatives. Respondent No.1 remains unserved as he is stated to have left the given address. There is no other address available with the Court for effecting his service except the one mentioned in the memo of parties and in the judgments and decrees passed by the Courts below and is the same on which the notice was sent.
2. In view thereof, this Court is left with no other option but to dismiss the present appeal for non-prosecution.
3. Dismissed for non-prosecution with liberty to revive in case anything survives in the matter. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed off.
24.10.2024 (ALKA SARIN)
Aman Jain JUDGE
NOTE: Whether speaking/non-speaking: Speaking
Whether reportable: Yes/No
AMAN JAIN
2024.10.25 09:39
I attest to the accuracy and
integrity of this document