Baljinder Kaur vs State Of Punjab And Others

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 18846 P&H
Judgement Date : 24 October, 2024

Punjab-Haryana High Court

Baljinder Kaur vs State Of Punjab And Others on 24 October, 2024

Author: Harsimran Singh Sethi

Bench: Harsimran Singh Sethi

                                Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:139542




109          IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
                          AT CHANDIGARH

                                  CWP-22875
                                        22875-2024 (O&M)
                                  Date of Decision : 24
                                                     24-10-2024

BALJINDER KAUR                                            ........Petitioner
                                    VERSUS

STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS                                ........Respondent(s)

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI

Present:     Mr. Manu K. Bhandari, Advocate and
             Mr. Arjun Sawhni, Advocate for the petitioner.

             Mr. Satnampreet Singh Chauhan, DAG Punjab.

HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI, J. (Oral)

In the present petition, the grievance of the petitioner is that the husband of the petitioner was entitled entitled for regularisation of his services under the Policy dated 23.01.2001 (Annexure P P-9)

9) keeping in view the judgment of this Court in CWP No.1169 of 2011 titled ""Balwinder Balwinder Kaur Vs. State of Punjab and ors.", decided on 04.05.2012, .2012, copy of which has been appended as Annexure P-13.

P Learned counsel for the petitioner submits in case, the benefit of regularisation of service is granted to the husband of the petitioner under the Policy dated 23.01.2001 (Annexure (Annexure P P-9), the petitioner will become entitled for the grant of pensionary benefits, which have not been given to her as of now.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner have already raised the said grievance in the legal notice ddated ated 13.02.2024 (Annexure P-14) P 14) but the same is still pending consideration with the 1 of 2 ::: Downloaded on - 29-10-2024 22:33:28 ::: Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:139542 CWP-22875-2024 -2- respondents and the petitioner will be satisfied, at this stage, in case a direction is issued to the respondents to decide the same by passing an appropriate speaking order in a time bound manner.

Notice of motion.

On the asking of the Court, Mr. Satnampreet Singh Chauhan, DAG, Punjab, who is present in Court, accepts notice on behalf of the respondent-State and submits that in case, the legal notice dated 13.02.2024 (Annexure P-14) has been received in the office of the concerned authorities and the same is still pending consideration with the authorities concerned, the same will be decided by the competent authority within a period of eight weeks from the date of the receipt of certified copy of this order by passing an appropriate speaking order. Learned counsel further submits that in case, it is found feasible to accept the claim of the petitioner, the same will be accepted, otherwise due reasons will be mentioned for not accepting the claim of the petitioner in the speaking order to be passed and the said order will be duly conveyed to the petitioner.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that keeping in view the statement of learned State counsel, the present petition may kindly be disposed of having been not pressed any further.

Ordered accordingly.



24-10-2024                                   (HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI)
Sapna Goyal
                                                     JUDGE


        NOTE:        Whether speaking: YES/NO
                     Whether reportable: YES/NO




                                 2 of 2
              ::: Downloaded on - 29-10-2024 22:33:28 :::