Punjab-Haryana High Court
Gagandeep Singh vs State Of Punjab And Anr on 18 November, 2024
Author: Kirti Singh
Bench: Kirti Singh
Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:150360
CRM-M-51457-2024
- 1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
300
CRM-M-51457-2024
Date of decision: 18.11.2024
GAGANDEEP SINGH ....Petitioner
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANR ...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE KIRTI SINGH
Present : Mr. A.S. Mann, Advocate
for the petitioner.
Mr. Kamalpreet Bawa, AAG, Punjab.
Mr. Gagan Bajaj, Advocate for respondent No.2.
KIRTI SINGH. J.(Oral)
1. The present petition has been filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for quashing of FIR No.0115 dated 29.06.2024, under Section 420 IPC registered at Police Station City II Mansa, District Mansa and all other consequential proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of the compromise dated 09.10.2024 (Annexure P-2).
2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and also gone through the case file.
3. This Court while issuing notice of motion vide order dated 18.10.2024, directed the parties to appear before the trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate for recording their statements with regard to the compromise.
4. Pursuant to the aforesaid order, report dated 28.10.2024 has been 1 of 3 ::: Downloaded on - 21-11-2024 23:07:48 ::: Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:150360 CRM-M-51457-2024
- 2- received from the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Mansa. A perusal of the said report reveals that statements of the concerned persons have been recorded in the present case, who have stated that the matter has been settled between them and they have no objection in case the FIR in question is quashed. The compromise effected between them is genuine, without any undue influence and coercion.
5. The Full Bench of this Court in Kulwinder Singh and others vs. State of Punjab, 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052, held that High Court has power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to allow the compounding of non-compoundable offence and quash the prosecution where the High Court is of the view that the same was required to prevent the abuse of the process of law or otherwise to secure the ends of justice. This power of quashing is not confined to matrimonial disputes alone.
6. Hon'ble the Supreme Court in the case of Gian Singh vs. State of Punjab and another, 2012 (4) RCR (Criminal) 543, had observed that in order to secure the ends of justice or to prevent the abuse of process of Court, inherent power can be used by this Court to quash criminal proceedings in which a com- promise has been effected. The relevant portion of para 57 of the said judgment reads thus:-
"57. The position that emerges from the above discussion can be summarised thus: the power of the High Court in quashing a criminal proceeding or FIR or complaint in exercise of its inherent jurisdiction is distinct and different from the power given to a criminal court for com- pounding the offences under Section 320 of the Code.
Inherent power is of wide plenitude with no statutory limitation but it has to be exercised in accord with the guideline engrafted in such power viz; (i) to secure the ends of justice or (ii) to prevent abuse of the 2 of 3 ::: Downloaded on - 21-11-2024 23:07:49 ::: Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:150360 CRM-M-51457-2024
- 3- process of any Court.
xxx xxx xxx. "
7. In view of the afore-referred judgments, perusing the report of the trial Court regarding amicable settlement between the petitioner(s) and the com- plainant, this Court finds that quashing the FIR will accord a quietus to all dis- putes between the parties and it is in the interest of both sides to bury the hatchet and lead a peaceful life. Thus, no useful purpose would be served in continuing the proceedings and in order to secure the ends of justice, the criminal proceedings in the present case deserve to be quashed.
8. Resultantly, the present petition is allowed and FIR No.0115 dated 29.06.2024, under Section 420 IPC registered at Police Station City II Mansa, Dis- trict Mansa and all other consequential proceedings are quashed qua the peti- tioner(s) on the basis of the compromise dated 09.10.2024 (Annexure P2), subject to payment of costs of Rs.10,000/- to be deposited in the Poor Patient Welfare Fund, PGIMER, Chandigarh within a period of one month.
9. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stands disposed of.
(KIRTI SINGH)
18.11.2024 JUDGE
amandeep
Whether speaking/reasoned. : Yes/No
Whether Reportable. : Yes/No
3 of 3
::: Downloaded on - 21-11-2024 23:07:49 :::