Punjab-Haryana High Court
Ms Nem Kumar Tarsem Chand vs The State Of Punjab And Others on 14 November, 2024
Author: Sanjeev Prakash Sharma
Bench: Sanjeev Prakash Sharma
ae i : rang ee et F084: PHHC4149075-D8 SES IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 126 CWP-30756-2024 Decided on : 14.11.2024 M/s Nem Kumar-Tarsem Chand (JV) ... Petitioner(s) Versus The State of Punjab and others ... Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH PRESENT: Mr. Rajesh Kumar Girdhar, Advocate, for the petitioner(s). Mr. Saurabh Kapoor, Addl. AG, Punjab. 3 2k 24g ok SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA, J. (Oral)
Admittedly, an arbitration clause addressed between the parties. The petitioner being a contractor can avail the provision of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
Keeping in view the arbitration clause, we would not exercise our discretionary jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.
Dismissed with the aforesaid liberty.
Misc. application(s), if any, also stands disposed of.
(SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA) JUDGE (SANJAY VASHISTH) JUDGE November 14, 2024 Lavisha Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable: Yes/No LAVISHA 2024.11.19 13:48 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment Punjab & Haryana High Court, Chandigarh