Punjab-Haryana High Court
Buta Singh vs State Of Punjab And Others on 13 November, 2024
APURVA
2024.11.14 13:38
I attest to the accuracy and
authenticity of this
document/judgment
High Court, Chandigarh
Village Bainstaniwal, Tehsil and District Hoshiarpur
Bainstaniwal
vide order dated 10.01.2019 (Annexure P-4).
07.09.2022
(Annexure P-5).
13.05.2024 (Annexure P-6)
the choice of learned Collector is not to be lightly interfered
APURVA
2024.11.14 13:38
I attest to the accuracy and
authenticity of this
document/judgment
High Court, Chandigarh
with, even if two views are possible.
6. There are concurrent findings recorded by the revenue
authorities below in favour of respondent No.5, who is an ex-serviceman and
is more qualified than the petitioner, having educational qualification of pre-university.
7. Learned counsel for the petitioner has not been able to point out any illegality or perversity in order dated 10.01.2019 (Annexure P-4) passed by the learned District Collector, Hoshiarpur; which was further affirmed by the learned Divisional Commissioner as well as the learned Financial Commissioner.
8. In view of the aforesaid discussion, I do not find any merit in this writ petition and the same is accordingly dismissed. The order dated 10.01.2019 (Annexure P-4) passed by the learned District Collector, Hoshiarpur, appointing respondent No.5 as Lambardar of Village Bainstaniwal, Tehsil and District Hoshiarpur; as affirmed by the learned Commissioner, Jalandhar Division, Jalandhar vide order dated 07.09.2022 (Annexure P-5) as well as the learned Financial Commissioner (Appeals), Punjab vide order dated 13.05.2024 (Annexure P-6); is hereby upheld.
9. All pending application(s), if any, shall also stand closed. APURVA 2024.11.14 13:38 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document/judgment High Court, Chandigarh