Punjab-Haryana High Court
Sabneet Singh vs Rajesh Kumar on 11 November, 2024
Author: Vikas Bahl
Bench: Vikas Bahl
Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:146653
CR-6564-2024 (O&M) [1]
138
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH
CR-6564-2024 (O&M)
Date of decision: 11.11.2024
Sabneet Singh ...Petitioner
Versus
Rajesh Kumar ...Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL
Present: Mr. Vishavjeet Singh Rishi, Advocate for the petitioner.
****
VIKAS BAHL, J. (ORAL)
1. Challenge in the present revision petition is to the judgment dated 03.10.2018 passed by the Rent Controller, Jalandhar in the Rent Case No.144 of 2014 vide which eviction petition filed by the respondent has been allowed. Challenge is also to the judgment dated 31.08.2024 passed by the Appellate Authority, Jalandhar in Rent Appeal No.138 of 2018 wherein the appeal filed by the petitioner has been dismissed by the Appellate Authority.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner, during the course of arguments, has submitted that the petitioner would withdraw the present revision petition but has sought time to vacate the premises and to shift to another premises. It has been stated that the petitioner is a tenant in the premises since 2013.
3. Keeping in view the abovesaid facts and circumstances and the limited prayer made by the petitioner, the present revision petition is 1 of 2 ::: Downloaded on - 13-11-2024 23:55:09 ::: Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:146653 CR-6564-2024 (O&M) [2] dismissed as withdrawn with following directions:-
i) The petitioner would vacate the premises and would hand over the keys of the premises to the respondent on or before 11.04.2025.
ii) The petitioner would pay an amount of Rs.10,000/- per month from the month of November, 2024 up to the period the petitioner stays in occupation, on or before 21st of every month.
iii) The petitioner would pay the arrears of rent/mesne profits within a period of five months from today.
iv) The petitioner would file an undertaking on the said three aspects before the Executing Court within a period of three weeks from today with an advance copy to counsel for the landlord in the Executing Court.
4. It is made clear that in case the petitioner does not submit the said undertaking or does not comply with any of the abovesaid conditions then it would be open to the respondent to seek immediate possession of the premises in question from the petitioner by applying for police help in addition to taking recourse to other proceedings including the Contempt of Courts Act.
5. All the pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand disposed of in view of the abovesaid order.
11.11.2024 (VIKAS BAHL)
Pawan JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No
Whether reportable:- Yes/No
2 of 2
::: Downloaded on - 13-11-2024 23:55:09 :::