Ravinder Singh Brar vs Union Of India And Others

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 19563 P&H
Judgement Date : 6 November, 2024

Punjab-Haryana High Court

Ravinder Singh Brar vs Union Of India And Others on 6 November, 2024

Author: Suvir Sehgal

Bench: Suvir Sehgal

                        CWP-25363-2024                                  -1-

                                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT
                                                     CHANDIGARH

                        (109)
                                                                                          CWP-25363-2024
                                                                               Date of decision:- 06.11.2024

                        Ravinder Singh Brar                                            ... Petitioner
                                                                  Versus
                        Union of India and others                                      ... Respondents


                        CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUVIR SEHGAL


                        Present:- Mr. Ranwant Singh Sangha, Advocate
                                  for the petitioner.

                                           Ms. Sehej Sandhawalia, Advocate
                                           for the respondents No.1 and 2.

                                                    ****
                        SUVIR SEHGAL, J. (ORAL)

1. By way of instant petition, petitioner has approached this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India inter-alia for issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing order dated 07.08.2024,Annexure P-7, passed by respondent No.2 and for directing respondent No.2 to issue a fresh passport to the petitioner.

2. At the outset, counsel for respondents No.1 and 2 has raised an objection that the Regional Passport Officer, Amritsar-respondent No.2 has rejected the application submitted by the petitioner by passing detailed order, Annexure P-7, against which an appeal lies under Section 11 of the Passports Act, 1967. She submits that the writ petition is not maintainable as the petitioner has an alternative remedy under the statute. KAMAL SHARMA 2024.11.07 17:19 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment High Court, Chandigarh. CWP-25363-2024 -2-

3. Faced with the objection raised by counsel for the respondents No.1 and 2, counsel for the petitioner seeks and is granted permission to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to avail the statutory remedy.

4. Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid.




                                                                              (SUVIR SEHGAL)
                                                                                  JUDGE
                        06.11.2024
                        Kamal


                                      Whether Speaking/Reasoned              Yes/No
                                      Whether Reportable                     Yes/No




KAMAL SHARMA
2024.11.07 17:19
I attest to the accuracy and
authenticity of this order/judgment
High Court, Chandigarh.