Take notes as you read a judgment using our Virtual Legal Assistant and get email alerts whenever a new judgment matches your query (Query Alert Service). Try out our Premium Member Services -- Sign up today and get free trial for one month.
Punjab-Haryana High Court
Pritam Singh And Others vs Mehnga Ram And Others on 6 May, 2024
Author: Alka Sarin
Bench: Alka Sarin
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
219 RSA No.1051 of 1996 (O&M)
Date of Decision : 06.05.2024
Pritam Singh and Another ....Appellants
VERSUS
Mehnga Ram and Others .....Respondents
CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN
Present : None for the appellants.
Mr. Ankit Gupta, Advocate for respondent Nos.1 to 3.
ALKA SARIN, J. (Oral)
1. The present appeal pertains to the year 1996. Vide order dated 15.01.2024 fresh notices were issued to the parties. As per office report, appellant No.1 is stated to be residing abroad. Appellant No.2 is stated to have died. There is no other address of appellant No.1 available except for the one as mentioned in the memo of parties as well as in the judgments of the Courts. None has come forward to be impleaded as legal representatives of appellant No.2.
2. Mr. Ankit Gupta, Advocate has put in appearance on behalf of respondent Nos.1 to 3 and has filed his power of attorney on behalf of respondent Nos.1 and 2 and memo of parties on behalf of respondent No.3, which are taken on record.
3. In view of the above, this Court is left with no other option but to dismiss the present appeal for non-prosecution. JITENDER KUMAR 2024.05.07 09:07 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment Chandigarh -2-
4. Dismissed for non-prosecution with liberty to revive in case anything survives in the matter. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed off.
( ALKA SARIN ) 06.05.2024 JUDGE jk NOTE: Whether speaking/non-speaking: Speaking Whether reportable: YES/NO JITENDER KUMAR 2024.05.07 09:07 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment Chandigarh