Take notes as you read a judgment using our Virtual Legal Assistant and get email alerts whenever a new judgment matches your query (Query Alert Service). Try out our Premium Member Services -- Sign up today and get free trial for one month.
Punjab-Haryana High Court
Roop Singh And Ors vs State Of Punjab And Ors on 14 May, 2024
Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:067098
CWP-11141-2024 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
128 CWP-11141-2024
Date of Decision : 14.05.2024
ROOP SINGH AND ORS ... PETITIONERS
V/S
STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS ... RESPONDENTS
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL
Present : Mr. J.S.Dhaliwal, Advocate
for the petitioners.
Mr. Aman Dhir, DAG, Punjab.
****
JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (Oral)
1. The petitioners through instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India are seeking direction to respondents to count the service rendered as Special Police Officer as qualifying service for the purpose of pensionary/retiral benefits.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioners, inter alia, contends that case of the petitioners is squarely covered by the judgment of this Court in Sukhjit Singh and others Vs. State of Punjab and others in CWP No.9936 of 2017.
3. Mr. Aman Dhir, DAG, Punjab who on advance notice is present in Court submits that in terms of above stated judgments of this Court, the respondents authorities in the case of various officials have 1 of 2 ::: Downloaded on - 15-05-2024 07:14:55 ::: Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:067098 CWP-11141-2024 2 considered their claim and passed orders. He further asserts that appropriate authority would consider case of the petitioners in terms of judgments of this Court in Sukhjit Singh (supra) and pass an appropriate order within 3 months from today.
4. In the wake of statements of both side, the present petition stands disposed of.
( JAGMOHAN BANSAL )
JUDGE
14.05.2024
anju
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No
Whether Reportable Yes/No
2 of 2
::: Downloaded on - 15-05-2024 07:14:55 :::