Take notes as you read a judgment using our Virtual Legal Assistant and get email alerts whenever a new judgment matches your query (Query Alert Service). Try out our Premium Member Services -- Sign up today and get free trial for one month.
Punjab-Haryana High Court
Ali Mohammad vs Radhey Shayam Etc on 9 May, 2024
Author: Alka Sarin
Bench: Alka Sarin
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH
224 RSA-3869-1998 (O&M)
Date of Decision : 09.05.2024
ALI MOHAMMAD .... Appellant
VERSUS
RADHEY SHAYAM AND ANR .... Respondents
CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN
Present : Mr. Akshat Mittal, Advocate for
Mr. Rajinder Goel, Advocate for the appellant.
Mr. Nitish Sharma, Advocate for the respondents.
ALKA SARIN, J. (ORAL)
1. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant states that he has no instructions in the matter.
2. The present appeal pertains to the year 1998. Vide order dated 07.03.2024 notice was issued to the appellant. As per the Office report, notice issued to the sole appellant has been received back unserved with remarks 'incomplete address'. There is no other address available with the Court for effecting service of the appellant except the one mentioned in the memo of parties and in the judgments and decrees passed by the Courts below and is the same on which the notice was sent.
3. In view thereof, this Court is left with no other option but to dismiss the present appeal for non-prosecution. AMAN JAIN 2024.05.09 20:45 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this judgment/order.
224 RSA-3869-1998 (O&M) -2-
4. Dismissed for non-prosecution with liberty to revive in case anything survives in the matter. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed off.
09.05.2024 (ALKA SARIN)
Aman Jain JUDGE
NOTE: Whether speaking/non-speaking: Speaking
Whether reportable: Yes/No
AMAN JAIN
2024.05.09 20:45
I attest to the accuracy and
integrity of this judgment/order.