Ram Lal Sharma vs Ramandeep Engg. Workks. Etc

Punjab-Haryana High Court

Ram Lal Sharma vs Ramandeep Engg. Workks. Etc on 9 May, 2024

Author: Alka Sarin

Bench: Alka Sarin

                                Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:065295




      IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
                     CHANDIGARH
207
                                                     RSA-1766-1997(O&M)
                                                 Date of decision : 09.05.2024

Ram Lal Sharma                                                ... Appellant(s)

                                        Versus

M/s Ramandeep Engineering Works and Others                  ...Respondent(s)

CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN

Present :   Mr. Akshat Mittal, Advocate for
            Mr. Rajinder Goel, Advocate for the appellant.

            Mr. Sudesh Kumar, Advocate for respondent No.5.

ALKA SARIN, J. (ORAL)

IOIN-RSA-1766-1997

1. The present IOIN was for service of the respondents. However, vide order dated 17.11.2023, notice for actual date of hearing in the main appeal was ordered to be issued to the appellant and respondents for today and accordingly the present IOIN being infructuous, is disposed off as such. RSA-1766-1997

2. The present appeal pertains to the year 1997. Vide order dated 17.11.2023 notices were issued to the parties. As per the service report, sole appellant was not found residing at the given address. This is the only address of the appellant which was given in the memo of parties and in the judgments and decrees passed by the Trial Court and the First Appellate Court. Respondent No.1 remains unserved as no such firm exists. Respondents No.2 and 5 stand duly served. Though Mr. Akshat Mittal, Advocate has appeared for Sh. Rajinder Goel, Advocate, yet he pleads no 1 of 2 ::: Downloaded on - 11-05-2024 10:23:49 ::: Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:065295 instructions on behalf of the appellant. In view thereof, this Court is left with no other option but to dismiss the present appeal for non-prosecution.

3. Dismissed for non-prosecution with liberty to revive in case anything survives in the matter. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed off.

09.05.2024                                                 (ALKA SARIN)
Ankur                                                         JUDGE

NOTE: Whether speaking/non-speaking: Speaking Whether reportable: YES/NO 2 of 2 ::: Downloaded on - 11-05-2024 10:23:50 :::