Punjab-Haryana High Court
Jai Bhagwan vs The Learned Presiding Officer And ... on 21 March, 2024
Author: Deepak Sibal
Bench: Deepak Sibal
Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:041323-DB
2024:PHHC:041323-DB
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
( Sr. No. 122 ) LPA No. 782 of 2024
Date of decision: 21.03.2024
Jai Bhagwan
.....Appellant
Versus
The Learned Presiding Officer, Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court,
Chandigarh and others
.....Respondents
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK MANCHANDA
Present : Ms. Veena Hooda, Advocate for the appellant.
***
DEEPAK SIBAL, J. (Oral)
(1) The present intra court appeal arises out of the judgment dated 04.01.2024 passed by a learned Single Judge of this Court partly allowing the appellant's petition filed by him to challenge therein the award dated 14.10.2008 passed by the Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Chandigarh.
(2) After hearing learned counsel for the appellant and going through the record of the case as also the impugned judgment, we find that the learned Single Judge, after having been convinced that the services of the appellant had been terminated without following the provisions of Section 25-F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, has ordered payment to the appellant a lump sum compensation of Rs.2,00,000/- for the reason that the project against which the appellant had been appointed had been completed 1 of 2 ::: Downloaded on - 06-04-2024 04:15:49 ::: Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:041323-DB LPA No. 782 of 2024 [2] 2024:PHHC:041323-DB long ago and because before termination of his services the appellant had served the management for only 03 years and that too on daily wage basis. (3) In the afore facts, the relief granted by the learned Single Judge is found to be reasonable warranting no interference on our part.
(4) Dismissed.
(DEEPAK SIBAL)
JUDGE
21.03.2024 ( DEEPAK MANCHANDA )
sunil yadav JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No
Whether reportable : Yes / No
2 of 2
::: Downloaded on - 06-04-2024 04:15:49 :::