Arshdeep Singh And Another vs State Of Punjab And Others

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 6480 P&H
Judgement Date : 21 March, 2024

Punjab-Haryana High Court

Arshdeep Singh And Another vs State Of Punjab And Others on 21 March, 2024

                                   Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:041481
                                                                            -1-

                                                             2024:PHHC:041481
CRM-M-59268-2023

           IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
                          CHANDIGARH
(278)
                                                       CRM-M-59268-2023
                                           Date of Decision:-March 21, 2024


Arshdeep Singh and another
                                                                 ......Petitioners
                                     Versus


State of Punjab and others
                                                               ......Respondents

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK JAIN
                    ****

Present:      Mr. H.S. Mander, Advocate for the petitioners.

              Mr. R.S. Bhatta, DAG, Punjab.
              Mr. Munish, Advocate for respondents No. 2 & 3.

                    ****

ALOK JAIN, J. (Oral)

1. The instant petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of FIR No. 52 dated 05.03.2021, registered under Sections 307, 323, 326, 148, 149 of the Indian Penal Code, at Police Station Mataur, SAS Nagar, Mohali (Annexure P-1) and all consequential proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise dated 20.09.2023 (Annexure P-2).

2. Keeping in view the fact that the parties entered into a compromise, this Court vide order dated 24.11.2023 directed the parties to appear before the Illaqa Magistrate/trial Court for getting their statements recorded in that regard. Pursuant thereto, a report dated 20.03.2024 has been received from the Chief Judicial Magistrate, SAS Nagar, Mohali, stating that the compromise arrived at between the parties is 1 of 3 ::: Downloaded on - 23-03-2024 13:52:45 ::: Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:041481 -2- 2024:PHHC:041481 CRM-M-59268-2023 voluntary and the same is without any pressure, coercion or undue influence.

3. Learned State Counsel and learned counsel for respondents No. 2 & 3 admit the factum of compromise and submit that they have no objection to quashing of the FIR on that basis.

4. Perusal of the aforesaid report establishes that the parties have amicably settled their dispute, and continuance of criminal proceedings in such a situation will be an exercise in futility, as the chances of ultimate conviction are bleak. The power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. can be exercised in such matters. It has been held by Supreme Court of India in cases Gian Singh v. State of Punjab and another 2012(10) SCC 303 and Narinder Singh and others v. State of Punjab and another 2014(6) SCC 406 that criminal cases having overwhelmingly civil character, particularly those arising out of commercial transactions or matrimonial relationships or family disputes, should be quashed when the parties have resolved their disputes among themselves in a bona fide manner.

5. The Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of "State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Laxmi Narayan" (2019) 5 SCC 688, has upheld that the High Court under Section 482 Cr.P.C. can quash the criminal proceedings in respect of non compoundable offences which are private in nature and do not have serious impact on society.

6. Keeping in view the law laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the aforesaid judgment, it is crystal clear that the dispute where the wrong is basically private or personal in nature and the parties have resolved their entire dispute, the High Court will be within its jurisdiction to quash the criminal proceedings if it is known that because of compromise 2 of 3 ::: Downloaded on - 23-03-2024 13:52:45 ::: Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:041481 -3- 2024:PHHC:041481 CRM-M-59268-2023 arrived at between the parties, there is remote possibility of securing conviction of the accused. In fact, in such cases, the Supreme Court has clearly observed that it would amount to extreme injustices, if despite settlement having been arrived at between the parties, the criminal proceedings are allowed to continue.

7. Consequently, this petition is allowed. FIR No. 52 dated 05.03.2021, registered under Sections 307, 323, 326, 148, 149 of the Indian Penal Code, at Police Station Mataur, SAS Nagar, Mohali (Annexure P-1) and all consequential proceedings arising therefrom, are hereby quashed qua the petitioners, subject to payment of cost of Rs. 25,000/- to be deposited by the petitioners jointly and Rs. 10,000/- to be deposited by respondents No.2 & 3 jointly within one month from today in Poor Patients Welfare Fund, PGIMER, Chandigarh.





                                                     (ALOK JAIN)
                                                        JUDGE
March 21, 2024
Parul

                  Whether speaking/reasoned:-        Yes/No
                  Whether Reportable:-               Yes/No




                                 3 of 3
              ::: Downloaded on - 23-03-2024 13:52:45 :::