Vikram Bhatt vs Union Of India And Anr

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 5836 P&H
Judgement Date : 14 March, 2024

Punjab-Haryana High Court

Vikram Bhatt vs Union Of India And Anr on 14 March, 2024

                                                          Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:036635




           IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
                         AT CHANDIGARH

109                                    2024:PHHC:036635
                                       CWP No. 5982 of 2024
                                       Date of Decision:14.03.2024

Vikram Bhatt

                                                     ....Petitioner

                                       vs.

Union of India and another

                                                     ....Respondents

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL


Present:     Mr. Vikram Satpal Anand, Advocate
             for the petitioner

             Mr. Ashutosh Dhankar, Advocate
             for the Union of India

               ***
JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL)

1. The petitioner through instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India is seeking direction to respondents to issue him passport.

2. The petitioner was embroiled in two FIRs. In FIR No. 117 dated 17.10.2015, under Sections 323, 325 of IPC, registered at Police Station Cantt. Ferozepur, he was acquitted vide judgment dated 01.12.2016 passed by JMIC, Ferozepur. In FIR No. 20 dated 07.03.2008, under Sections 392, 34, 120-B of IPC and Sections 25, 27, 54, 59 of the Arms Act, 1959, registered at Police Station Cantt. Ferozepur, he was convicted for the period already undergone vide judgment dated 02.05.2012 passed by JMIC, Ferozepur. The petitioner vide application dated 18.09.2023 has applied for passport, however, till date passport has not been issued.

1 of 2 ::: Downloaded on - 15-03-2024 08:37:59 ::: Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:036635 CWP No. 5982 of 2024 -2- 2024:PHHC:036635

3. Notice of motion.

4. Mr. Ashutosh Dhankar, Advocate for Union of India, who on advance notice is present in Court, accepts notice and waives service. He submits that petitioner may be directed to appear before the passport authority alongwith requisite documents and the passport authority, thereafter, would pass an appropriate order within six weeks, in accordance with law.

5. Learned counsel for the petitioner agrees to the aforesaid arrangement.

6. In the wake of statement of both sides, the petition stands disposed of with a direction to petitioner to appear before the passport authority on 09.04.2024 alongwith requisite documents. On doing so, the passport authority would pass an appropriate order within six weeks from 09.04.2024.

(JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE 14.03.2024 paramjit Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes Whether reportable: No Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:036635 2 of 2 ::: Downloaded on - 15-03-2024 08:37:59 :::