Punjab-Haryana High Court
(O&M) Pseb vs Sat Pal Singh on 13 March, 2024
Author: Anil Kshetarpal
Bench: Anil Kshetarpal
Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:036426
RSA-993-1994 2024:PHHC:036426 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
RSA-993-1994
Date of decision: March 13, 2024
Punjab State Electricity Board
....Appellant
Versus
Sat Pal Singh
....Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL
Present:- Mr. Rajiv Sharma, Advocate
for the appellant.
****
ANIL KSHETARPAL, J (Oral)
1. This is a defendant's Second Appeal against concurrent findings of fact arrived at by the Courts below while decreeing the plaintiff's suit for the grant of decree for mandatory injunction directing him to restore his electric connection and also pass a decree of permanent injunction restraining them from recovering Rs.20,374/- on the basis of Memo No. 2708 dated 24.07.1989.
2. The respondent was running a small flour mill. It was alleged by the appellant(defendant) that he was committing theft of electricity. On that basis Memo No. 2708 dated 24.07.1989 was issued. Both the courts below found that the said Memo was not issued in accordance with law.
3. Heard learned counsel representing the appellant at length and with his able assistance perused the paper book along with the requisitioned record.
4. Though, learned counsel representing the appellant made a sincere attempt, however he failed to draw attention of this Court to misreading and non-
1 of 2 ::: Downloaded on - 23-03-2024 04:46:59 ::: Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:036426 RSA-993-1994 2024:PHHC:036426 2 reading of material evidence. He also failed to draw attention of the Court to any perversity in the impugned judgment.
5. In view of the aforesaid facts, no ground to interfere is made out.
6. The present appeal is dismissed accordingly.
(ANIL KSHETARPAL) JUDGE March 13, 2024 archana Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes Whether reportable : No 2 of 2 ::: Downloaded on - 23-03-2024 04:47:00 :::