Punjab-Haryana High Court
Yudhister Dev vs Virender Kumar on 13 March, 2024
Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:035751
Neutral Citation No. 2024:PHHC:035751
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
127
RSA-272-1993 (O&M)
Date of decision: 13.03.2024
YUDHISTER DEV .........Petitioner
VERSUS
VIRENDER KUMAR ........Respondent
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ
*****
Present:- None for the appellant.
Mr. Adarsh Jain, Advocate for the respondent.
*****
VINOD S. BHARDWAJ, J. (Oral)
The Regular Second Appeal has been filed by the appellant against the judgment dated 09.09.1992 passed by Addl. Senior Sub Judge, Bahadurgarh, District Rohtak as well as to the judgment dated 09.12.1992 passed by Addl. District Judge-III, Rohtak.
The matter pertains to the year 1993. The matter came up for hearing on 09.12.2022 and notice was issued to the appellant as well as counsel. It has been reported by the Registry that the sole appellant is reported to have left the said place for 5-6 years ago while the counsel pleads that he is not the counsel in the case and was appearing in the said matter on behalf of the Senior Counsel.
There is no representation on behalf of the appellant. Counsel for the respondent has however informed that the suit in question had been instituted on an allegation of nuisance and that if the appellant/plaintiff is reported to have left the place, he would 1 of 2 ::: Downloaded on - 15-03-2024 03:42:37 ::: Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:035751 RSA-272-1993 (O&M) -2- have no surviving cause of action at all.
Without proceeding any further in the matter, it seems that the appellant is no more interested in pursuing the present petition.
Dismissed for non-prosecution.
All the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, are also disposed of.
(VINOD S. BHARDWAJ) JUDGE MARCH 13, 2024.
Vishal sharma
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No
Whether reportable : Yes/No
Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:035751 2 of 2 ::: Downloaded on - 15-03-2024 03:42:37 :::