Raj Kumar vs Union Of India And Anr

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 5681 P&H
Judgement Date : 13 March, 2024

Punjab-Haryana High Court

Raj Kumar vs Union Of India And Anr on 13 March, 2024

                                                         Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:035664



                                                                2024:PHHC:035664

CWP-4299-2024                                                                      -1-


            IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
                         AT CHANDIGARH


104                                             CWP-4299-2024
                                                Date of Decision: 13.03.2024


Raj Kumar                                                             ...Petitioner


                                      Versus


Union of India and another                                          ...Respondents


CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL

Present:-     Ms. Shivya Sehgal, Advocate for the petitioner
              Ms. Neha Sharma, Senior Panel Counsel,
              for Union of India-respondents
              Mr. Aman Dhir, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab
              ***

JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (Oral)

1. The petitioner through instant petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is seeking direction to respondents to re-issue him passport.

2. The petitioner was issued passport on 08.05.2013 which expired on 07.05.2023. He applied for re-issuance of passport vide application dated 29.12.2023.

3. Ms. Shivya Sehgal, Advocate submits that as per her information, the police vide report dated 02.01.2024 have confirmed that there is no criminal case pending against the petitioner. The case of the petitioner is squarely covered by judgment of this Court in Mohan Lal @ Mohna vs. Union of India and others 2023 SCC Online P&H 1391.

1 of 2 ::: Downloaded on - 14-03-2024 07:58:05 ::: Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:035664 2024:PHHC:035664 CWP-4299-2024 -2-

4. Ms. Neha Sharma, learned counsel for respondent-Union of India submits that as per her instructions, passport authority has not received clear report from the police authorities, thus, it is unable to process application of the petitioner.

5. On the asking of Court, Mr. Aman Dhir, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab got verified the factual position from the jurisdictional police authorities. He submits that as per telephonic instructions received from Police Station Moti Nagar, District Ludhiana, no criminal case is pending against the petitioner.

6. Faced with this, learned counsel for the respondents submits that competent authority would decide application of the petitioner within 6 weeks from today in terms of judgment passed by this Court in Mohan Lal (supra).

7. In the wake of statement of learned counsel for the respondents, the present petition stands disposed of.



                                                         (JAGMOHAN BANSAL)
                                                               JUDGE
13.03.2024
Mohit Kumar
                  Whether speaking/reasoned            Yes/No
                  Whether reportable                   Yes/No




Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:035664 2 of 2 ::: Downloaded on - 14-03-2024 07:58:06 :::