Punjab-Haryana High Court
M/S Yr Kumar And Co vs Regional Provident Fund Commissioner on 3 July, 2024
207
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
CWP-12997-1998 (O&M)
DECIDED ON: 03.07.2024
M/S YR KUMAR AND COMPANY .....PETITIONER
VERSUS
REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER AND
ANOTHER .....RESPONDENTS
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH.
Present: None for the petitioner.
Mr. Rajesh Hooda, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
SANJAY VASHISTH, J (ORAL)
1. After noticing the fact that Mr. V.G. Dogra, Advocate, who filed present writ petition, has expired, fresh notice was issued to the petitioner, at the address mentioned in the present writ petition.
2. As per office note, notice issued to the petitioner has been received back unserved with a report that "company locked for a long time".
3. In the absence of any assistance on behalf of the petitioner, this Court is unable to move with the proceedings of the present writ petition.
4. Thus, this Court is left with no other option, except to dismiss the present writ petition for non-prosecution.
5. Dismissed for non-prosecution.
LAVISHA 2024.07.03 16:19 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment Punjab & Haryana High Court, Chandigarh CWP-12997-1998 (O&M) -2-
6. However, liberty is granted to the petitioner to move an appropriate application for revival of the present writ petition, within a period of 12 weeks from today, in case, any substantial cause of action requiring its adjudication, still exists.
Let copy of this order be forwarded at the address of the petitioner as mentioned in the present writ petition.
(SANJAY VASHISTH)
03.07.2024 JUDGE
Lavisha
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No
Whether reportable Yes/ No
LAVISHA
2024.07.03 16:19
I attest to the accuracy and
authenticity of this order/judgment Punjab & Haryana High Court, Chandigarh