Punjab-Haryana High Court
State Of Haryana And Others vs Subhash Chander on 3 July, 2024
Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:081834
203
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH
RSA No.1049 of 1996 (O&M)
Date of decision: 03.07.2024
State of Haryana and others
....Appellants
Versus
Subhash Chander
....Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAMIT KUMAR
Present: Mr. Saurabh Mohunta, DAG, Haryana
for the appellants.
Mr. Jaivir Yadav, Sr. Advocate
with Mr. Aman Gautam, Advocate for the respondent.
NAMIT KUMAR J. (Oral)
The appellants/defendants have filed the instant appeal against the judgment and decree dated 15.12.1995, whereby the learned Lower Appellate Court, while partly allowing the appeal filed by the plaintiff/respondent has partly set-aside the judgment and decree dated 15.01.1993, passed by the learned trial Court vide which the suit for declaration filed by the plaintiff/respondent has been dismissed.
On the last date of hearing, the following order was passed:-
"Learned counsel appearing for the respondent seeks another opportunity to comply with order dated 22.02.2024 passed by this Court.
Adjourned to 03.07.2024.
It is made clear that in case, no legal heir of the respondent is brought on record by the next date of hearing, appropriate order will be passed."
1 of 2 ::: Downloaded on - 21-07-2024 11:20:38 ::: Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:081834 RSA No.1049 of 1996 (O&M) -2- Counsel for the respondent submits that despite his best efforts, he has not been able to contact the LRs of sole respondent.
In view of the above, counsel for the State submits that at this stage, he would not press the appeal, however, liberty may be granted to revive the same in case any execution is filed by the LRs of respondent.
Disposed of with aforesaid liberty.
(NAMIT KUMAR) JUDGE 03.07.2024 yakub Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No 2 of 2 ::: Downloaded on - 21-07-2024 11:20:38 :::