Karanveer Singh Etc vs Bakhshi Ram Etc

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 10539 P&H
Judgement Date : 1 July, 2024

Punjab-Haryana High Court

Karanveer Singh Etc vs Bakhshi Ram Etc on 1 July, 2024

                                Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:080997




201
        IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA
                    AT CHANDIGARH

                                                 RSA No. 1624 of 1999 (O&M)
                                                 Date of Decision: 01.07.2024

Karanveer Singh and another

                                                              .......... Appellants
                                        Versus

Bakshi Ram and another
                                                            .......... Respondents

CORAM:       HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA

Present:      Mr. Lalit Chander Sharma, Advocate
              for the appellants-defendants.

              None for the respondents-plaintiffs.

                                ****
HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL)

By way of present appeal, challenge has been laid to the judgment and decree dated 24.10.1998 passed by the Court of District Judge, Jalandhar (hereinafter to be referred as "First Appellate Court"), whereby the appeal filed against the judgment and decree dated 07.09.1996 passed by the Court of Civil Judge (Junior Division), Jalandhar (hereinafter to be referred as "trial Court"), dismissing the suit for damages (filed at the instance of respondents-plaintiffs), was allowed thereby decreeing the suit.

[2] Notice of the appeal stood issued vide order dated 18.09.1999 passed by this Court.

[3] A perusal of the record shows that the operation of impugned judgment and decree dated 24.10.1998 passed by the First Appellate Court, 1 of 2 ::: Downloaded on - 20-07-2024 19:19:41 ::: Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:080997 RSA No. 1624 of 1999 (O&M) -2- has never been stayed.

[4] Learned counsel for the appellants submits that despite having been made all sincere efforts, the appellants are not responding. [5] In view of the above, it appears that the appellants are not interesting in pursing the present appeal any further and as such, there is no option except to the dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution.

[6]            Ordered accordingly.

[7]            However, the appellants would be at liberty to seek revival of

the present appeal, in case any cause survives. [8] Registry to convey the copy of this order to the appellants as well as respondents on their address.

[9] Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed off.

July 01, 2024                                          ( HARKESH MANUJA )
'dk kamra'                                                  JUDGE

             Whether Speaking/reasoned                  Yes/No
             Whether Reportable                         Yes/No




                                  2 of 2
               ::: Downloaded on - 20-07-2024 19:19:42 :::