Gurjit Singh vs State Of Punjab An Dors

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 9232 P&H
Judgement Date : 30 April, 2024

Punjab-Haryana High Court

Gurjit Singh vs State Of Punjab An Dors on 30 April, 2024

                                        Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:058503




CRR-462-2004                      -1            2024:PHHC:058503

202/2          IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
                         AT CHANDIGARH

                                                CRR-462-2004
                                                Date of Reserve:22.03.2024
                                                Date of Decision:30.04.2024

Gurjit Singh                                                 ...Petitioner


                                        Vs.
State of Punjab and others                                   ...Respondents
Coram :        Hon'ble Mr. Justice N.S.Shekhawat

Present:       Mr. Sarthak Jindal, Advocate for
               Mr. Santpal Singh Sidhu, Advocate
               for the petitioner.

               Mr. M.S. Bajwa, DAG, Punjab.

          Mr. Balram Singh, Advocate
          for the private respondents.
                       ***

N.S.Shekhawat J.

1. The petitioner/complainant had filed the present revision petition against the impugned judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 23.12.2003, passed by the Court of Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court, Ferozepur, whereby the respondents No.2 to 5 were convicted for the offences punishable under Sections 307/379/34 of IPC and were sentenced to undergo RI for a period of 07 years each for an offence punishable under Section 307 of IPC and to pay a fine of Rs.1000/- each, along with default stipulation and were sentenced to undergo RI for a period of 02 years each for an offence punishable under Section 379/34 of IPC and to pay a fine of Rs.500/- each, along with default stipulation, for the modification of the impugned judgment/order to the extent that the sentence imposed on the respondents No.2 to 5 may be ordered to be enhanced.




                                       1 of 2
                    ::: Downloaded on - 04-05-2024 07:03:09 :::
                                        Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:058503




CRR-462-2004                     -2            2024:PHHC:058503

2. Since in the connected matter i.e. CRA-S-219-SB-2004, the sentence imposed on the respondents No.2 to 5 has already been reduced by this Court, there is no requirement of passing separate order in the present revision petition. Even otherwise, the petitioner had no locus standi to file the present revision petition for enhancement of sentence imposed on the respondents No.2 to 5, in view of the provisions contained in Section 377 Cr. P.C. Thus, the present petition is ordered to be dismissed.




                                               (N.S.SHEKHAWAT)
30.04.2024                                          JUDGE
hitesh

                   Whether speaking/reasoned         :      Yes/No
                   Whether reportable                :      Yes/No




                                      2 of 2
                   ::: Downloaded on - 04-05-2024 07:03:09 :::