Veena Arora vs State Of Punjab And Others

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 8942 P&H
Judgement Date : 26 April, 2024

Punjab-Haryana High Court

Veena Arora vs State Of Punjab And Others on 26 April, 2024

               CWP-9408-2024                        2024:PHHC:057282                             1

                                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA
                                              AT CHANDIGARH
               117
                                                                 CWP-9408-2024
                                                                 Date of decision: 26.04.2024

               Veena Arora
                                                                                    ....Petitioner
                                                    Versus

               State of Punjab and others
                                                                                   ...Respondents


               CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY
                                        *****
               Present :           Ms. Riti Aggarwal, Advocate
                                   for the petitioners.

                          *****
               AMAN CHAUDHARY. J (ORAL).

1. The prayer made in the present petition is for directing the respondents to grant benefit of previous service rendered by the petitioner in Government Aided Schools towards fixation of her pay on her joining.

2. Learned counsel would submit that the benefit of previous service rendered by the petitioner in Government aided schools towards fixation of her pay upon having joined the Government schools with consequential benefits was granted to similarly situated in terms of the judgment of this Court in Sunil Kumar Sharma and Others vs. State of Punjab in CWP-4629-2015, whereby a batch of petitions were allowed on 19.02.2018, Annexure P-3 against which the LPA and SLP, both stand dismissed and it was implemented vide order dated 06.12.2023. In wake of the above, a legal notice dated 21.12.2023, Annexure P-6, has been served upon the respondents, which has yet not evoked any response. She thus, at this stage, on instructions, submits that the petitioner is sanguine of it being considered in a positive manner, in case, a direction is given to the HAMANT 2024.04.26 18:22 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment CWP-9408-2024 2024:PHHC:057282 2 respondents to decide the same in a time bound manner by granting her an opportunity of hearing.

3. Notice of motion.

4. At the asking of the Court, Mr. Satnam Preet Singh, DAG, Punjab accepts notice on behalf of the respondent-State and has no objection to the limited prayer made.

5. In view of the above and without commenting on the merits of the case, this petition is hereby disposed of with a direction to the respondents to decide the legal notice dated 21.12.2023, Annexure P-6 in light of the afore-referred judgment, within a period of 6 months, which this Court has no reason to believe the authorities would not address in a just, fair and reasonable manner. Upon doing so, after notice and hearing offered to her and if found entitled, grant the benefit forthwith. Needless to say, if the orders are adverse to her interest, the same shall contain reasons and the petitioner shall be free to seek legal redress thereupon.





                                                                    (AMAN CHAUDHARY)
                                                                         JUDGE
               26.04.2024
               Hemant

                                   Whether speaking/reasoned    :      Yes / No
                                   Whether reportable           :      Yes / No




HAMANT
2024.04.26 18:22
I attest to the accuracy and
integrity of this order/judgment