Balbir Singh And Ors vs State Of Punjab And Ors

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 8833 P&H
Judgement Date : 25 April, 2024

Punjab-Haryana High Court

Balbir Singh And Ors vs State Of Punjab And Ors on 25 April, 2024

                                                                                      2024:PHHC:056332
              129
                                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
                                                  AT CHANDIGARH

                                                                      CWP-9302-2024
                                                                      Date of Decision: 25.04.2024


              BALBIR SINGH AND ORS                                                 ...Petitioners
                                                            Versus
              STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS                                              ...Respondents

              CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL
              Present:-                Mr. Jasbir Singh Mohri, Advocate
                                       for the petitioners.

                                       Mr. Aman Dhir, DAG, Punjab.

                                             *****

              JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (Oral)

1. The petitioners through instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India is seeking direction to respondent to count the service rendered as Special Police Officer for qualifying service for the purpose of pensionary/retiral benefits.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioners, inter alia, contends that case of the petitioners are squarely covered by Division Bench judgment of this Court in Harbans Lal Vs. State of Punjab in CWP No.2371 of 2010 and in Sukhjit Singh and others Vs. State of Punjab and others in CWP No.9936 of 2017.

3. Mr. Aman Dhir, DAG, Punjab who on advance notice is present in Court submits that in terms of judgment of Division Bench of this Court in Harbans Lal (supra), the respondent authorities in the case of various officials have considered their claim and passed orders. He further asserts HIMANSHU 2024.04.25 17:00 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.

CWP-9302-2024 -2-

that appropriate authority would consider case of the petitioners in terms of judgment of Division Bench of this Court in Harbans Lal (supra) and pass an appropriate order within 3 months from today.

4. In the wake of statement of both sides, the present petition stands disposed of.


                                                                         (JAGMOHAN BANSAL)
              25.04.2024                                                      JUDGE
              himanshu

                                       Whether speaking/reasoned            Yes/No
                                       Whether reportable                   Yes/No




HIMANSHU
2024.04.25 17:00
I attest to the accuracy and
authenticity of this order/judgment.