Ram Lal vs State Of Punjab Etc

Punjab-Haryana High Court

Ram Lal vs State Of Punjab Etc on 20 April, 2024

                                              Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:053283
‭CWP-18350-1998 (O&M)‬                          ‭2024:PHHC:053283‬
                                                               ‭-‬‭1‭-‬ ‬
                 ‭IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA‬
                            ‭AT CHANDIGARH‬
‭207‬
                                                            ‭ WP-18350-1998 (O&M)‬
                                                            C
                                                            ‭Date of decision: 20.04.2024‬

‭Ram Lal‬
                                                                                  ‭....Petitioner‬
                                           ‭Versus‬

‭State of Punjab and another‬
                                                                                 ‭...Respondents‬

‭CORAM:‬ ‭HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY‬ ‭*****‬ ‭Present :‬ ‭Mr. Sunny Singla, Advocate‬ ‭for the petitioner.‬ ‭Mr. Swapan Shorey, DAG, Punjab.‬ ‭*****‬ ‭AMAN CHAUDHARY. J (Oral)‬ ‭1.‬ ‭The‬ ‭prayer‬ ‭in‬ ‭the‬ ‭present‬ ‭petition‬ ‭is‬ ‭for‬ ‭directing‬ ‭the‬ ‭respondents‬ ‭to‬ ‭pay‬ ‭to‬ ‭the‬ ‭petitioner‬ ‭the‬ ‭salary‬ ‭for‬ ‭the‬ ‭post‬ ‭of‬ ‭clerk‬ ‭against‬ ‭which he had been discharging his duties.‬ ‭2.‬ ‭Learned‬ ‭counsel‬ ‭would‬ ‭contend‬ ‭that‬ ‭the‬ ‭petitioner‬ ‭was‬ ‭appointed‬‭by‬‭the‬‭Departmental‬‭Selection‬‭Committee‬‭to‬‭the‬‭post‬‭of‬‭Store‬‭Boy,‬ ‭a‬‭Class‬‭IV‬‭post,‬‭in‬‭the‬‭pay‬‭scale‬‭of‬‭Rs.325-495‬‭vide‬‭orders‬‭dated‬‭31.10.1981‬ ‭and‬ ‭in‬ ‭the‬ ‭same‬ ‭year,‬ ‭he‬ ‭was‬ ‭assigned‬ ‭duties‬ ‭of‬ ‭higher‬ ‭post‬ ‭of‬ ‭clerk.‬ ‭However,‬‭salary‬‭for‬‭that‬‭post‬‭was‬‭not‬‭granted‬‭to‬‭him‬‭against‬‭which‬‭he‬‭finally‬ ‭came‬‭to‬‭be‬‭promoted‬‭on‬‭14.12.2016,‬‭Annexure‬‭P-14.‬ ‭No‬‭decision‬‭regarding‬ ‭it‬ ‭has‬ ‭been‬‭taken‬‭by‬‭the‬‭department‬‭in‬‭the‬‭speaking‬‭order‬‭dated‬‭23.11.2012,‬ ‭Annexure‬ ‭P-9‬ ‭and‬ ‭even‬ ‭previously‬ ‭vide‬ ‭order‬ ‭dated‬ ‭05.08.1999,‬ ‭Annexure‬ ‭R-1,‬ ‭it‬ ‭had‬ ‭been‬ ‭observed‬ ‭that‬ ‭regarding‬ ‭giving‬ ‭salary‬ ‭to‬ ‭the‬ ‭petitioner‬ ‭for‬ ‭working‬ ‭against‬ ‭clerical‬ ‭seat,‬ ‭shall‬ ‭be‬ ‭considered‬ ‭later‬ ‭on.‬ ‭His‬ ‭entitlement‬ ‭stems‬ ‭from‬ ‭the‬ ‭judgments‬ ‭in‬ ‭Selvaraj‬ ‭vs.‬ ‭Lt.‬ ‭Governor‬ ‭of‬ ‭Island,‬ ‭Port‬ ‭Blair‬‭,‬‭1998(4)‬‭RSJ‬‭22;‬‭Smt.‬‭P.‬‭Grover‬‭vs.‬‭State‬‭of‬‭Haryana‬‭and‬‭another‬‭,‬ ‭(1983)‬ ‭4‬ ‭SCC‬ ‭291;‬ ‭Om‬‭Parkash‬‭and‬‭others‬‭vs.‬‭The‬‭State‬‭of‬‭Punjab‬‭and‬ 1 of 2 ::: Downloaded on - 20-04-2024 22:47:20 ::: Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:053283 ‭CWP-18350-1998 (O&M)‬ ‭2024:PHHC:053283‬ ‭-‬‭2‭-‬ ‬ ‭others‬‭,‬ ‭2003(4)‬ ‭SLR‬ ‭100;‬ ‭Darshan‬ ‭Singh‬ ‭vs.‬ ‭State‬ ‭of‬ ‭Punjab,‬ ‭CWP-4552-2003,‬ ‭decided‬ ‭on‬ ‭01.07.2010;‬ ‭Sukhraj‬ ‭Singh‬ ‭and‬ ‭others‬ ‭vs.‬ ‭State‬‭of‬‭Punjab‬‭and‬‭another,‬‭CWP-9125-2014,‬‭decided‬‭on‬‭09.01.2018,‬‭and‬ ‭Gurjant‬ ‭Singh‬ ‭and‬ ‭others‬ ‭vs.‬ ‭State‬ ‭of‬ ‭Haryana‬ ‭and‬ ‭others‬‭,‬ ‭CWP-26598-2015,‬‭decided‬‭on‬‭12.03.2020.‬‭He,‬‭on‬‭instructions,‬‭prays‬‭that‬‭the‬ ‭petitioner‬ ‭would‬ ‭be‬ ‭satisfied,‬ ‭in‬ ‭case‬ ‭a‬ ‭time‬ ‭bound‬ ‭direction‬‭is‬‭given‬‭to‬‭the‬ ‭respondents to consider his claim, keeping in view the aforesaid judgments.‬ ‭3.‬ ‭Learned‬ ‭State‬ ‭counsel‬ ‭has‬ ‭no‬ ‭objection‬ ‭to‬ ‭the‬ ‭limited‬ ‭prayer‬ ‭made.‬ ‭4.‬ ‭In‬‭wake‬‭of‬‭the‬‭aforesaid‬‭and‬‭without‬‭commenting‬‭on‬‭the‬‭merits‬ ‭of‬ ‭the‬ ‭case,‬ ‭this‬ ‭petition‬ ‭is‬ ‭hereby‬ ‭disposed‬ ‭of‬ ‭with‬ ‭a‬ ‭direction‬ ‭to‬ ‭the‬ ‭respondents‬‭to‬‭consider‬‭and‬‭decide‬‭the‬‭claim‬‭of‬‭the‬‭petitioner‬‭within‬‭a‬‭period‬ ‭of‬ ‭6‬ ‭months,‬ ‭by‬ ‭taking‬ ‭into‬ ‭account‬ ‭the‬ ‭aforesaid‬ ‭submissions‬ ‭as‬ ‭also‬ ‭the‬ ‭judgments‬ ‭relied‬ ‭upon,‬ ‭which‬ ‭this‬ ‭Court‬ ‭has‬ ‭no‬ ‭reason‬ ‭to‬ ‭believe‬ ‭the‬ ‭authorities‬ ‭would‬ ‭not‬ ‭address‬ ‭in‬ ‭a‬ ‭just,‬ ‭fair‬ ‭and‬ ‭reasonable‬ ‭manner.‬ ‭Upon‬ ‭doing‬ ‭so‬ ‭after‬ ‭notice‬ ‭and‬ ‭hearing‬ ‭offered‬ ‭to‬ ‭him‬ ‭and‬ ‭if‬ ‭found‬ ‭entitled,‬ ‭notional‬ ‭benefits‬ ‭be‬ ‭granted‬ ‭forthwith.‬ ‭Needless‬ ‭to‬ ‭say,‬ ‭if‬ ‭the‬ ‭orders‬ ‭are‬ ‭adverse‬‭to‬‭his‬‭interest,‬‭the‬‭same‬‭shall‬‭contain‬‭reasons‬‭and‬‭the‬‭petitioner‬‭shall‬ ‭be free to seek legal redress.‬ ‭(AMAN CHAUDHARY)‬ ‭JUDGE‬ 2‭ 0.04.2024‬ ‭Hemant‬ ‭ hether speaking/reasoned‬ W :‭‬ ‭ es / No‬ Y ‭Whether reportable‬ ‭:‬ ‭Yes / No‬ 2 of 2 ::: Downloaded on - 20-04-2024 22:47:21 :::