Punjab-Haryana High Court
Sant Ram And Another vs Pyare Lal on 19 April, 2024
Author: Vikas Bahl
Bench: Vikas Bahl
Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:052412
2024:PHHC:052412
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
121
RSA-10-1993 (O&M)
Decided on :19.04.2024
Sant Ram and another
. . . Appellants
Versus
Pyare Lal
. . . Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL
PRESENT: Mr. Gaurav Sharma, Advocate
for the appellants.
*****
VIKAS BAHL, J.(ORAL)
1. Defendants is in appeal.
2. The suit filed by the plaintiff for mandatory injunction for directing the defendants to demolish the wall, was decreed and the defendants were directed to demolish the wall on the eastern side of the house of the plaintiff.
3. The appeal filed by the defendants was dismissed vide judgment dated 03.12.1992. It is against the said judgment of both the Courts below that the present Regular Second Appeal has been filed.
4. Learned counsel for the appellants has submitted that inspite of his best efforts, he has not been able to get in touch with the appellants to verify as to whether anything survives in the present case and hence, he prays that the present appeal may be dismissed for non-prosecution at this stage but liberty may be granted to the appellants to revive the appeal, in case, any cause of action survives.
1 of 2 ::: Downloaded on - 20-04-2024 18:30:31 ::: Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:052412 RSA-10-1993 (O&M) -2- 2024:PHHC:052412
5. In view of the above facts and circumstances, present appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution with the aforesaid liberty.
6. Registry is directed to send the copy of the present order to the parties on the address mentioned in the memo of parties.
(VIKAS BAHL) JUDGE 19.04.2024 Mehak Whether reasoned/speaking? Yes/No Whether reportable? Yes/No 2 of 2 ::: Downloaded on - 20-04-2024 18:30:31 :::