Punjab-Haryana High Court
Neeraj Kumar And Others vs State Of Punjab And Others on 15 April, 2024
2024:PHHC:050006
129
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
CWP-8252-2024
Date of Decision: 15.04.2024
Neeraj Kumar and others ...Petitioners
Versus
State of Punjab and others ...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL
Present:- Mr. Jasbir Singh Mohri, Advocate
for the petitioners.
Mr. Aman Dhir, DAG, Punjab.
*****
JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (Oral)
1. The petitioners through instant petition under Articles 226/227 of Constitution of India are seeking directions to the respondents to decide demand notice dated 28.02.2024 (Annexure P-11).
2. Learned counsel for the petitioners, at the outset, submits that the petitioners have filed demand notice dated 28.02.2024 (Annexure P-11) seeking seniority, full salary, pay fixation, increments, arrears of pay and consequential benefits on notional basis. This Court vide order dated 04.04.2022 passed in CWP No.6995 of 2022 directed the respondents to decide similar demand notice. The respondents in compliance of directions of this Court has passed order dated 05.12.2022 (Annexure P-9) and order dated 19.02.2024 (Annexure P-10) whereby Department has granted full pay benefit to the similarly situated employees. The petitioners are entitled to same relief. HIMANSHU 2024.04.15 17:02 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.
4. Learned State counsel asserts that representation of the petitioner shall be decided within two months from today. He further assures the Court that the competent authority while disposing representation would consider order dated 05.12.2022 (Annexure P-9) and 19.02.2024 (Annexure P-10) passed by Additional Director General of Police.
5. In view of the above, the petition stands disposed of.
(JAGMOHAN BANSAL)
15.04.2024 JUDGE
himanshu
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No
Whether reportable Yes/No
HIMANSHU
2024.04.15 17:02
I attest to the accuracy and
authenticity of this order/judgment.