Punjab-Haryana High Court
Joginder Singh And Ors vs Ac First Grade Dudhan Sadhan And Ors on 10 April, 2024
Author: Rajesh Bhardwaj
Bench: Rajesh Bhardwaj
CWP-16286-2017 -1-
Neutral Citation No. 2024:PHHC:048815
102
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
CWP-16286-2017
Date of Decision: April 10, 2024
Joginder Singh and others
......Petitioners
Versus
Assistant Collector First Grade, Dudhan Sandhan and others
......Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAJESH BHARDWAJ
Present: Mr.Sherry K.Singla, Advocate
for the petitioners.
Mr.Navneet Singh, Sr.DAG, Punjab.
Mr.Vishal Goel, Advocate
for respondents No.2 and 3 (through VC).
........
RAJESH BHARDWAJ, J.(ORAL)
Prayer in the present petition is for quashing of impugned order, dated 26.04.2017, passed by respondent No.1 (Annexure P-10) vide which the objections filed by the petitioners against the proposed mode of partition has been wrongly dismissed and impugned mode of partition has been ordered to be sanctioned, which is contrary to the settled principles of law governing the mode of partition in the partition cases and is also contrary to the civil Court judgment and decree dated 09/11/2016, Annexure P-1.
It has been submitted by learned counsel for the parties that the parties have amicably resolved the issue by way of compromise, dated 07.02.2024, copy of which has been placed on record and hence the present petition may be disposed of as such.
MEENU2024.04.10 18:56 In view of the above statement made by learned counsel for the I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-16286-2017 -2- Neutral Citation No. 2024:PHHC:048815 parties, the present petition is disposed of. However, the parties would be bound by the terms of compromise effected between them.
April 10, 2024 ( RAJESH BHARDWAJ )
meenuss JUDGE
1. Whether speaking/reasoned ? Yes/No
2. Whether reportable ? Yes/No
MEENU
2024.04.10 18:56
I attest to the accuracy and
integrity of this document