Punjab-Haryana High Court
Ram Karan vs State Of Haryana And Another on 8 April, 2024
Author: Jasjit Singh Bedi
Bench: Jasjit Singh Bedi
2024:PHHC: 047536
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH
209-A CRM-M-56609-2023
Date of decision: 08.04.2024
RAM KARAN .... PETITIONER(S)
VERSUS
STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER ...RESPONDENT(S)
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASJIT SINGH BEDI
Present: Mr. Sidarth, Advocate and
Mr. Suraj, Advocate
for the petitioner(s).
Mr. R.K. Singla, DAG, Haryana.
****
JASJIT SINGH BEDI, J. (Oral)
The prayer in this petition is for quashing of an FIR No.92 dated 18.04.2023 registered under Sections 406 and 420 of the IPC, 1860 at Police Station Sadar Tohana Fatehabad along with all consequential proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of a compromise arrived at between the petitioner and respondent No.2.
Vide order dated 09.11.2023 this Court had directed the parties to appear before Illaqa Magistrate for getting their statements recorded with regard to the compromise dated 26.10.2023 (Annexure P-2).
The Illaqa Magistrate/trial Court was to submit a report in this regard giving certain details as enumerated in the said order.
Pursuant to the order dated 09.11.2023 passed by this Court, the parties have appeared before the learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Tohana and as per the report dated 29.02.2024 submitted to this Court, both the parties have got recorded their respective statements in Court. KUSUM 2024.04.09 10:46 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment Punjab & Haryana High Court, CHD CRM-M-56609-2023 -2- A perusal of the aforesaid report would show that the parties have effected a genuine compromise without there being any pressure, coercion or undue influence. In view of the compromise there is a remote possibility of the complaint coming forward to support the prosecution case. The powers under Section 482 Cr.PC can be exercised in such like situation in order to prevent unnecessary vagaries of criminal trial to be faced by the parties, when there are remote chances of conviction of the accused. The compromise in question is found to be fully in consonance with the direction issued by the Court in "Kulwinder Singh & Ors. Vs. State of Punjab 2007(3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab & Anr., 2012(4) RCR (Crl.) 543".
In view of the aforesaid report of the learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Tohana accompanied by statements of both the parties, the FIR No.92 dated 18.04.2023 registered under Sections 406 and 420 of the IPC, 1860 at Police Station Sadar Tohana Fatehabad along with all consequential proceedings arising therefrom are hereby quashed qua the petitioner.
Petition stands disposed of.
(JASJIT SINGH BEDI)
JUDGE
08.04.2024
Kusum
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No
Whether Reportable Yes/No
KUSUM
2024.04.09 10:46
I attest to the accuracy and
authenticity of this order/judgment
Punjab & Haryana High Court, CHD