Punjab-Haryana High Court
Darshan Singh And Others vs State Of Punjab And Others on 8 April, 2024
Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:047104
CWP-7878-2024 -1- 2024:PHHC:047104
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
133 CWP-7878-2024
Date of Decision : 08.04.2024
DARSHAN SINGH AND OTHERS ... PETITIONERS
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS ... RESPONDENTS
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL
Present : Mr.Nitesh Singla, Advocate
for the petitioners.
Mr. Aman Dhir, DAG, Punjab.
****
JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (Oral)
1. The petitioners through instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India are seeking direction to respondents to count the service rendered as Special Police Officer for qualifying service for the purpose of pensionary/retiral benefits.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioners, inter alia, contends that case of the petitioners is squarely covered by the judgment of this Court in Harbans Lal Vs. State of Punjab in CWP No.2371 of 2010 and Sukhjit Singh and others Vs. State of Punjab and others in CWP No.9936 of 2017.
3. Mr. Aman Dhir, DAG, Punjab, who on advance notice is present in Court submits that in terms of above stated judgments of this Court, the respondents-authorities in the case of various officials have considered their claim and passed orders. He further asserts that appropriate authority would consider case of the petitioners in terms of judgments of this Court in Harbans 1 of 2 ::: Downloaded on - 09-04-2024 04:18:22 ::: Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:047104 CWP-7878-2024 -2- 2024:PHHC:047104 Lal and Sukhjit Singh (supra) and pass an appropriate order within 3 months from today.
4. In the wake of statement of both sides, the present petition stands disposed of.
08.04.2024 [JAGMOHAN BANSAL]
anju JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No
Whether reportable Yes/No
2 of 2
::: Downloaded on - 09-04-2024 04:18:23 :::