Punjab-Haryana High Court
Sarbjit Kaur And Ors vs State Of Punjab And Others on 5 April, 2024
Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:046440
2024:PHHC:046440
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
127 CWP-7771-2024
Date of decision: 05.04.2024
SARBJIT KAUR AND OTHERS ....PETITIONERS
Vs.
STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS ...RESPONDENTS
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL
Present: Mr. J.S. Mohri, Advocate
for the petitioners.
Mr. Aman Dhir, DAG, Punjab.
****
JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J (ORAL)
1. The petitioners through instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India are seeking direction to respondents to count the service rendered as Special Police Officer for qualifying service for the purpose of pensionary/retiral benefits.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioners, inter alia, contends that case of the petitioner is squarely covered by Division Bench judgment of this Court in Harbans Lal Vs. State of Punjab in CWP No.2371 of 2010.
3. Mr. Aman Dhir, DAG, Punjab who on advance notice is present in Court submits that in terms of judgment of Division Bench of this Court in Harbans Lal (supra), the respondent authorities in the case of various officials have considered their claim and passed orders. He further asserts that appropriate authority would consider case of the petitioner in terms of judgment of Division Bench of this Court in Harbans Lal (supra) and pass an appropriate order within 3 months from today.
1 of 2 ::: Downloaded on - 06-04-2024 21:46:12 ::: Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:046440 CWP-7771-2024 -2-
4. In the wake of statements of both sides, the present petition stands disposed of.
05.04.2024 [JAGMOHAN BANSAL]
manoj JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No
Whether reportable Yes/No
2 of 2
::: Downloaded on - 06-04-2024 21:46:13 :::