Punjab-Haryana High Court
Inderjit Singh vs State Of Punjab And Others on 4 April, 2024
Author: Sandeep Moudgil
Bench: Sandeep Moudgil
Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:046863
2024:PHHC: 046863
CRM-M- 48505-2023 (O&M) -1-
279
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M- 48505-2023 (O&M)
DECIDED ON: April 04, 2024
INDERJIT SINGH
.....PETITIONER
VERSUS
STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
.....RESPONDENTS
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MOUDGIL
Present: Mr.Pardeep Kumar Kapila, Advocate
for the petitioner.
Mr. Amit Shukla, AAG, Punjab.
Ms. Kamlesh, Advocate
for respondent No. 2 and 3.
*****
SANDEEP MOUDGIL, J. (ORAL)
This is a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of FIR No. 69 dated 22.06.2021 under Sections 452, 323, 506, 148, 149 IPC at Police Station Mehta, District Amritsar Rural (Annexure P-1), on the basis of compromise.
During the pendency of the dispute, the parties have compromised the matter and filed the present petition for quashing of FIR.
Vide order dated 05.10.2023 and 19.12.2023, parties were directed to appear before the Illaqa Magistrate/Trial Court and report with regard to the genuineness of the compromise was called for.
1 of 3 ::: Downloaded on - 20-04-2024 01:39:00 ::: Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:046863 2024:PHHC: 046863 CRM-M- 48505-2023 (O&M) -2- The report dated 01.02.2024 has been received from Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Baba Bakala Sahib stating that the parties have entered into a compromise, which is genuine, voluntary and without any coercion or undue influence.
Learned counsel for respondent No.2 and 3 submits that he has no objection to the quashing of present FIR.
Full Bench of this Court in Kulwinder Singh and others vs. State of Punjab, 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052, has held:-
"The only inevitable conclusion from the above discussion is that there is no statutory bar under the Cr.P.C. which can affect the inherent power of this Court under Section 482. Further, the same cannot be limited to matrimonial cases alone and the Court has the wide power to quash the proceedings even in non- compoundable offences notwithstanding the bar under Section 320 of the Cr.P.C., in order to prevent the abuse of law and to secure the ends of justice.
The power under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. is to be exercised Ex-Debitia Justitia to prevent an abuse of process of Court. There can neither be an exhaustive list nor the defined para-meters to enable a High Court to invoke or exercise its inherent powers. It will always depend upon the facts and circumstances of each case. The power under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. has no limits. However, the High Court will exercise it sparingly and with utmost care and caution. The exercise of power has to be with circumspection and restraint. The Court is a vital and an extra-ordinary effective instrument to maintain and control social order. The Courts play role of paramount importance in achieving peace, harmony and ever- lasting congeniality in society. Resolution of a dispute by way of a compromise between
2 of 3 ::: Downloaded on - 20-04-2024 01:39:01 ::: Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:046863 2024:PHHC: 046863 CRM-M- 48505-2023 (O&M) -3- two warring groups, therefore, should attract the immediate and prompt attention of a Court which should endeavour to give full effect to the same unless such compromise is abhorrent to lawful composition of the society or would promote savagery."
The legal principles as laid down for quashing of the judgment were also approved by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the matter of 'Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and another,(2012) 10 SCC 303'. Furthermore, the broad principles for exercising the powers under Section 482 were summarized by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the matter of 'Parbatbhai Aahir @ Parbatbhai Bhimsinhbhai Karmur and others versus State of Gujarat and another" (2017) 9 SCC 641'.
It is evident that in view of the amicable resolution of the issues amongst the parties, no useful purpose would be served by continuation of the proceedings. The furtherance of the proceedings is likely to be a waste of judicial time and there appears to be no chances of conviction.
In view of above, FIR No. 69 dated 22.06.2021 under Sections 452, 323, 506, 148, 149 IPC at Police Station Mehta, District Amritsar Rural with all the consequential proceedings arising therefrom, is quashed qua the petitioner, on the basis of compromise.
The present petition is hereby allowed.
(SANDEEP MOUDGIL)
April 04, 2024 JUDGE
Seema
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes
Whether reportable No
3 of 3
::: Downloaded on - 20-04-2024 01:39:01 :::